Start learning 50% faster. Sign in now
Statement I: The sum of Rohan's, Sheela's, and Mala's age is 95. This statement alone is not sufficient because it doesn't provide information about the individual ages. Statement II: Rohan is younger than Mala. This statement alone is not sufficient because it only provides a relationship between Rohan and Mala but doesn't give specific ages. Statement III: Mala is 10 years older than Sheela. This statement alone is not sufficient as it only gives the age difference between Mala and Sheela but doesn't provide any individual ages. Combining statements II and III: Since Rohan is younger than Mala and Mala is 10 years older than Sheela, we can deduce that Mala is older than Sheela and Rohan. However, we still can't determine Mala's exact age. Combining all three statements: With all three statements combined, we know the relationship between Mala, Rohan, and Sheela, as well as the total of their ages. Therefore, we can calculate Mala's age. So, the correct answer is: 4. Statements I, II, and III together are sufficient.
Which of the following constitute a valid right to private defence?
Act to which a person is compelled to do it by threat is a defence under which section of the IPC?
If right to private defence is subjected to risk of harm to innocent person_______________?
Is a pecuniary benefit covered under S. 92 for acts done in good faith for the benefit of a person without consent?
Right to private defence should be in proportion with:
Right to private defence is covered under which sections of IPC?
Which of the following is no more a recognized form of punishment in India as per IPC?
Acts of a Judge are specifically protected under which section of IPC?
Restrictions against right to private defence are contained under which section of IPC?
What is the amount of fine which can be imposed as per IPC, in case no expressed sum is mentioned?