Given below is a statement followed by some conclusions. You have to take the given statement to be true even if it seems to be at variance with the commonly known facts and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follow(s) from the given statement. Statement: Sachin Tendulkar was the greatest batsman in Indian Cricket Conclusions:
I. There will be no other batsman greater than Sachin Tendulkar in Indian Cricket.
II. Sachin Tendulkar is the greatest batsman in the world. Choose the right option from below

. There will be no other batsman greater than Sachin Tendulkar in Indian Cricket. This conclusion cannot be definitively inferred from the statement. While Sachin Tendulkar is considered the greatest batsman in Indian Cricket by many, it is possible that another batsman could emerge in the future who is considered greater. So, conclusion I does not necessarily follow. II. Sachin Tendulkar is the greatest batsman in the world. The statement only mentions that Sachin Tendulkar was the greatest batsman in Indian Cricket, but it does not make any claim about him being the greatest in the world. So, conclusion II does not follow. Therefore, the correct option is: D. Neither of them follows