The question given below consists of three statements

Solution

I: 'elegance wisdom is discover' is coded as 'rg, sd, qa, cv' II: 'discover prefer deliver to upper' is coded as 'cv, lb, ur, pd, sx'. From I and II, we conclude that 'discover' is coded as 'cv'. From statement I alone, in the same code language 'outsource prefer career' is coded as 'lb, uj, dm', and 'career elegance posture numeral' is coded as 'dm, rg, ft, wb', we get: The code for 'career' is 'dm'. The code for 'prefer' is 'lb'. The code for 'elegance' is 'rg'. We have multiple possibilities for the code of 'wisdom upper'. Thus, data given in statement I alone is not sufficient. From statement II alone, in the same code language 'deliver prefer of career' is coded as 'ur, lb, dm, gm', and 'career is discover tonight' is coded as 'cv, dm, qa, jh', we get: The code for 'discover' is 'cv'. The code for 'prefer' is either 'lb' or 'ur'. The code for 'deliver' is either 'ur' or 'lb'. The code for 'career' is 'dm'. The code for 'of' is 'gm'. The code for 'is' is 'qa'. The code for 'tonight' is 'jh'. We have multiple possibilities for the code of 'wisdom upper'. Thus, data given in statement II alone, is not sufficient. From statement III alone, in the same code language 'discover deliver severe problem' is coded as 'cv, ur, yk, pw', and 'problem arises deliver course' is coded as 'pw, tk, zb, ur', we get: The code for 'discover' is 'cv'. The code for 'deliver' is 'ur'. The code for 'problem' is 'pw'. Thus, data given in statement III alone, is not sufficient. From statement I and II together, we get: The code for 'wisdom' is 'sd'. The code of 'wisdom upper' is either 'sd, pd' or 'sd, sx'. From statement I, II, and III together, we get: The code of 'wisdom upper' is either 'sd, pd' or 'sd, sx'. So, data given in statement I, statement II, and in statement III together is not sufficient to answer the question.