Question
Statement : During a one day match, Australian fielder
Labuschagne was observed not obeying one of the many recent changes implemented by the ICC, the one that no longer allows 'fake fielding' antics on the field. Courses of Action: I. Labuschagne should be penalised for disobedience. II. Labuschagne should be barred from playing the next match. In the questions below are given a statement followed by two courses of action numbered I and II. A course of action is a step or administrative decision to be taken for improvement, follow-up or further action in regard to the problem, policy, etc. On the basis of the information given in the statement to be true, then decide which of the suggested courses of action logically follow(s) for pursuing.Solution
Since the player has shown disobedience, he should be penalised thus I follows. Any extreme action should be avoided while taking a course of action unless it is the only option left. Thus, II does not follow.
Who has written the novel ‘Ajay to Yogi Adityanath’?
Which one of the following is not an iron ore?
Consider the following pairs:

Which NBFCs are now allowed to co-lend with private lenders under RBI’s 2025 Co-Lending Arrangement reforms?
According to a joint report by India Cellular & Electronics Association (ICEA) and Accenture, what is the estimated revenue potential that circular busi...
Which tribal community celebrates the festival called Sohrai, derived from the paleolithic age word 'soro'?
In which year was Raj Bhavan established in Nainital?
Regarding the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC), consider the following statements:
1.The NHRC investigates complaints related to human rig...
India recently won the 2024 ICC T20 World Cup for the second time. In which year did India first win the ICC T20 World Cup?
'Mukhyamantri Ladli Behna Awas Yojana' has been launched in which state?