Question
Statement : During a one day match, Australian fielder
Labuschagne was observed not obeying one of the many recent changes implemented by the ICC, the one that no longer allows 'fake fielding' antics on the field. Courses of Action: I. Labuschagne should be penalised for disobedience. II. Labuschagne should be barred from playing the next match. In the questions below are given a statement followed by two courses of action numbered I and II. A course of action is a step or administrative decision to be taken for improvement, follow-up or further action in regard to the problem, policy, etc. On the basis of the information given in the statement to be true, then decide which of the suggested courses of action logically follow(s) for pursuing.Solution
Since the player has shown disobedience, he should be penalised thus I follows. Any extreme action should be avoided while taking a course of action unless it is the only option left. Thus, II does not follow.
Consider the following statements about the revolt of 1857:
1. For the first time in history, a pan-India participation was present against the...
Under which Article of the Indian Constitution can a Governor promulgate an ordinance?
Consider the following pairs:

Which of the above pairs...
Consider the following statements with reference to advent of European power in India:
1. Farrukhsiyar’s Farmans exempted the British East In...
‘Zimmerman Plan’ is related to which of the following?
Consider the following events with reference to the Indian history:
1. Battle of Wandiwash
2. Second Carnatic War
3. Treaty of Pari...
The Kharsawan massacre in 1948 was a protest against what?
Consider the following statements with reference to the Ghadar Party:
1. It was founded by expatriate Indians to overthrow British rule in Ind...
A great reformer of the 19th century India, he fought for the conditions of women and the lower castes and was himself subjected to child marriage. He ...
Who was the first Indian to win a Nobel Prize after independence?