Question
Statement : During a one day match, Australian fielder
Labuschagne was observed not obeying one of the many recent changes implemented by the ICC, the one that no longer allows 'fake fielding' antics on the field. Courses of Action: I. Labuschagne should be penalised for disobedience. II. Labuschagne should be barred from playing the next match. In the questions below are given a statement followed by two courses of action numbered I and II. A course of action is a step or administrative decision to be taken for improvement, follow-up or further action in regard to the problem, policy, etc. On the basis of the information given in the statement to be true, then decide which of the suggested courses of action logically follow(s) for pursuing.Solution
Since the player has shown disobedience, he should be penalised thus I follows. Any extreme action should be avoided while taking a course of action unless it is the only option left. Thus, II does not follow.
Which of the following statements about health insurance in India is/are correct?
1) The Ayushman Bharat Yojana is a health insurance scheme f...
In credit management, which of the following is a major risk for MSMEs that is caused by delays in payments from large customers and the accumulation of...
Who manages the ASPIRE Fund of Funds?
Which of the following investment of banks are not marked-to-market?
_____________ are known as the stipulation collateral to the main purpose of the contract.
What is the primary focus of ethics?
What is the maximum loan-to-value (LTV) ratio allowed for loans sanctioned by banks against the pledge of gold ornaments and jewellery for non-agricultu...
The current pension systems of National Pension System (NPS) is a _____________ plan.
The ownership structure of a Regional Rural bank is?
For identification and measurement of operational risk, how many loss events have been identified?