Question
Statement : During a one day match, Australian fielder
Labuschagne was observed not obeying one of the many recent changes implemented by the ICC, the one that no longer allows 'fake fielding' antics on the field. Courses of Action: I. Labuschagne should be penalised for disobedience. II. Labuschagne should be barred from playing the next match. In the questions below are given a statement followed by two courses of action numbered I and II. A course of action is a step or administrative decision to be taken for improvement, follow-up or further action in regard to the problem, policy, etc. On the basis of the information given in the statement to be true, then decide which of the suggested courses of action logically follow(s) for pursuing.Solution
Since the player has shown disobedience, he should be penalised thus I follows. Any extreme action should be avoided while taking a course of action unless it is the only option left. Thus, II does not follow.
Which companies are required to have at least one women director?
On the death of a partner, when can the partnership business continue?
I.             When there are more than 2 partners in the f...
Whether the contents of documents or electronic records, can be proved by oral evidence?
The Aircraft Act provides that in the interest of the safety of aircraft operations, if the Central Government decides to regulate construction, erecti...
A relevant confession becomes irrelevant when
Under which products order specifications for vanaspati, margarine and shortenings are laid down?
The Madrid Protocol is an international treaty that facilitates the registration and management of:
What is the minimum age of a director?
The officers and other employees of the Authority under the IRDA Act may be appointed by whom?
The Performance Review Committee under the IFSCA Act shall consists of _______________ of the Authority