Answer-<p><strong>Statement </strong>: During a one day match, Australian fielder Labusch...

Since the player has shown disobedience, he should be penalised thus I follows. Any extreme action should be avoided while taking a course of action unless it is the only option left. Thus, II does not follow.

Question

Statement : During a one day match, Australian fielder Labuschagne was observed not obeying one of the many recent changes implemented by the ICC, the one that no longer allows 'fake fielding' antics on the field. Courses of Action:
I. Labuschagne should be penalised for disobedience.
II. Labuschagne should be barred from playing the next match.

In the questions below are given a statement followed by two courses of action numbered I and
II. A course of action is a step or administrative decision to be taken for improvement, follow-up or further action in regard to the problem, policy, etc. On the basis of the information given in the statement to be true, then decide which of the suggested courses of action logically follow(s) for pursuing.

A Only II follows

B Only I follows

C Both I and II follow

D Neither I nor II follow

E Either I or II follow

Practice Next