Question
In each of the questions below are given some
statements followed by two conclusions. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the given statements disregarding commonly known facts. Statements: Q > R = S; S < T < V; V > P Conclusion: I. V > R II. Q ≤ PSolution
Q > R = S < T < V > PÂ Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â R < V. Hence conclusion I is true. Q > R = S < T < V > PÂ Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â No relationship can be established between Q and P. Hence conclusion II is not true.
   Who is eligible for appointment as Governor?
Supremacy of Law is the first meaning of Rule of Law was established by?
In case of a decree for execution of a document, draft of document shall be prepared by___.
Coal mines shall be allocated by way of
Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) obligations arise under:Â
In 2020, the Ministry of Home Affairs constituted a committee to review the three codes of criminal law. Who was appointed as the head of this committee?
When an order under Section 5(1) extends DSPE powers to any such area, Section 5(2) provides that a member of the DSPE, while discharging the functions ...
Under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, what happens if a party knows that a provision from which the parties may derogate or a requirement un...
The purposive approach to statutory interpretation:Â
Mistake referred to in Proviso (1) to Section 92 of Indian Evidence Act, refers to