Start learning 50% faster. Sign in now
QY – ZY ÷ UY x KY à Incorrect, because the last condition UY x KY is not satisfied. QY – ZY x UY ÷ KY à Correct, because it satisfies all the given conditions. KY – ZY ÷ UY x QY à Incorrect, because the condition UY x QY is not satisfied. KY – UY ÷ ZY x QY à Incorrect, because the condition ZY x QY is not satisfied. ‘QY – ZY x UY ÷ KY’ represents that ‘UY is the daughter of QY’. Hence the correct answer is (B).
The relation of Partnership arises from :
Section 25 of The Limitation Act, 1963 deals with_______?
Indian Evidence Act does not expressly mention about:
What is the defense of "contributory negligence" in tort law?
In which of the following cases can courts intervene in an arbitral proceeding?
A minor may be admitted to the benefits of partnership
S.110 of evidence Act support the statement that :
The Chairperson of the IRDA shall not hold office after he has attained the age of__________________
The Supreme Court Judgment in Palvinder Kaur vs State of Punjab relates to :