Question
A statement is given, followed by two arguments
numbered (I) and (II). Decide which of the given arguments strongly supports the statement.  Statement: Should mercy killing be legalized in India? Argument I: Yes. Mercy killing is already legalized in several other countries.  Argument II: No. Given India’s current social fabric, there is a high probability that the mercy killing provision might end up being misused by some people for their ulterior motives.Solution
The stance of other countries with regards to mercy killing is not necessarily related to what India's stance on the matter should be, since the socio-cultural factors prevailing in those countries might be different from those prevailing in India. Thus, Argument I is a weak argument. Argument II, on the other hand, points out a genuine problem with regards to legalizing mercy killing in the Indian context, therefore, Argument II is a strong argument. Â Hence, the correct answer is (B).
No dividend shall be declared or paid by a company for any financial year except________________
Which of the following is not a power granted to the authorities under the PMLA?
Under the RTI Act, 2005, what is the time limit for a Public Information Officer (PIO) to respond to an RTI application?
As per the Indian Constitution of India it shall be the duty of ________ to protect every state against external aggression and internal disturbances.
The Historic Judgment of Privy Council m Pakala Narayan Swami vs. The King Emperor deals with:
Which regulatory body in India is responsible for regulating and supervising the capital markets, including stock exchanges, brokers, and other market i...
What is the minimum number of witnesses required to prove any fact?
As per IPC who are the people who are not liable when working in their official capacities?
According to the SEBI Act the Securities Appellate Tribunal shall________________
In a criminal matter, appeal shall lie to the Supreme Court from the order of a High Court, if________.Â
Relevant for Exams:
