Question
The question is whether ‘A’ was ravished and
thereafter murdered________ The fact that, without making a complaint, she said she had been ravished.Solution
Sec 157: In order to corroborate the testimony of a witness, any former statement made by such witness relating to the same fact, at or about the time when the fact took place, or before any authority legally competent to investigate the fact, may be proved. Sec 32(1): When the statement is made by a person as to the cause of his death, or as to any of the circumstances of the transaction which resulted in his death, in cases in which the cause of that person's death comes into question.
Which of the following are the requisites of a valid adoption?
Service of Summons to a defendant has to be made within _____ days of institution of a suit?
As per Section 2(ll) of the Employees’ Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 superannuation in relation to an employee, who is the me...
Which of the following is not correct with respect to wagering agreement?
Article 14 of Indian Constitution does not prohibit
Which of the following is true about the concept of "mahr" in Muslim Personal Law?
The age limit for driving a vehicle in a public place is?
A, in India, instigates B, a foreigner in Goa, to commit a murder in Goa. What offence has A committed?
The question is, whether A and B, were married. The fact that they were usually received and treated by their friends as husband and wife, is relevant. ...
The landmark judgment in Navtej Singh Johar & Ors. V. Union of India related to