According to the Companies Act tin case of a Producer Company the alteration of the provisions of memorandum relating to the change of the place of its registered office from one State to another shall not take effect unless _____________.
It is approved by the Central Government on an application, Explanation: Section 378H - Amendment of memorandum: (4) The alteration of the provisions of memorandum relating to the change of the place of its registered office from one State to another shall not take effect unless it is approved by the Central Government on an application in such form and manner as may be prescribed.
Statements: H @ B, B * E, V © E, W $ V
 Conclusions:     I.W $ E                 II.H @ E               Â...
Statements: T < U = V = W < X < Y; Z = Y < R < S < O
Conclusions:
I. Z > U
II. T < O
Statement: L = C; E ≥ M ≥ U ≥ C
Conclusion:
I. E > L
II. E = L
Statements: B % L, L & Y, Y @ I, I # Q
Conclusions: I. Q & YÂ Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â II. B # I
...What is the place of question mark (?) in the given expression does the expression L < I and W > L is definitely true?
W = P ≥ M ? L ; P ≤ I
Statements:Â J @ R % S % B; S $ Y $ Z
Conclusions :         I. R % Z                II. J @ B         III...
Statement: M < N ≤ O = P, Q ≥ O ≤ R ≤ Z
Conclusion: I. Q > MÂ Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â II. Z > M
...Statement: E < F ≤ G = H, I ≥ G ≤ J ≤ K
Conclusion: I. K > EÂ Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â II. H > K
Statements: O > M = Q > S; M ≥ K > A; Q ≤ O < E
Conclusions: Â Â Â Â Â I. O > SÂ Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â II. K < OÂ Â Â Â Â Â Â Â ...
Statement: P = Q ≥ S ≥ T < O < Z ≥ X; T > H
Conclusion:
I.  H ≥ X
II. Â P > H
...
