Question
In the question below there are three statements
followed by three conclusions I, II and III. You have to take the four given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the given statements disregarding commonly known facts. Statements: Only Bears are Camels. Some Bears are not Dogs. 100% Dogs are Dogs. Conclusions: I. Some Dogs are Camels is a possibility. II. All Bears are Camels is a possibility. III. Some Dogs are Dogs.Solution
Only Bears are Camels → All Camels are Bears and Camels cannot have any positive relation with anyone. Hence conclusion I does not follow. Only Bears are Camels → Some Bears are Camels (I) → Probable conclusion → All Bears may be Camels (A). Hence conclusion II follows. 100% Dogs are Dogs → Conversion → Some Dogs are Dogs (I). Hence conclusion III follows.
A company has Net Sales of ₹1,000 lakhs, Net Profit of ₹80 lakhs, Total Assets of ₹750 lakhs, and Equity of ₹250 lakhs.
Calculate Return ...
Under the Income-tax Act, Deferred Tax Asset is recognized when:
Which instance of SaaS allows users to explore functionality of web services such as Google Maps, Payroll Processing and Credit Card Processing Services...
Number of days in a month for purposes of computing taxable gratuity in case the employee is covered under the Payment of gratuity Act, 1972, are?
How much deduction under section 80TTA of Income Tax Act is allowed?
Which one of the following is a deferred tax asset?
Which of the following is not a payment product of NPCI?
In the context of ICDS V, which category of assets does this standard specifically address?
Which of the following is NOT a characteristic of MIS?
If an employee does not make an intimation to their employer about their selection regarding the tax regime, the employer will:
