Question
In the question below there are four statements
followed by three conclusions I, II and III. You have to take the three given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the four statements disregarding commonly known facts. Statements: Only few plates are cups. No spoon is cup. Some saucers are spoons. All saucers are bowls. Conclusions: I. All spoons being bowls is a possibility. II. Some plates are not spoons. III. Some plates are bowls.Solution
Some saucers are spoons (I) + Some bowls are saucers (I) β Probable conclusion β All spoons may be bowls (I). Hence conclusion I follows. Only few plates are cups (I) + No cup is spoon (E) β Some plates are not spoons (O). Hence conclusion II follows but conclusion III does not follow.
Under Section 17(1) of the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986, for offences by Government Departments, who is deemed guilty?
What does "social security" include as per the Code on Social Security?
How are Judges of the Supreme Court appointed and what is their term of office as per the Constitution?
Consider the following statements about electronic signatures:
1. Electronic signature includes digital signature.
2. Only those electroni...
Which of the following landmark cases led to the striking down of a provision of the IT Act, 2000, on the ground that it violated freedom of speech and ...
Dunlop Pneumatic Tyre Co Ltd vs. Selfridge & Co. is a leading case related to__________________
What constitutes defamation under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita?
Which of the following best describes the provision relating to driving a motor vehicle by a person without a valid driving licence under the Motor Vehi...
Whoever wages war against the Government of India or attempts to wage such war shall be punished with:
What can a company formed under the Companies Act, which has no significant accounting transactions and is intended for a future project or asset holdin...