Question
In the question below there are three statements
followed by two conclusions I and II. You have to take the three given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the three statements disregarding commonly known facts. Statements: A few Owl is Sparrow. Some Sparrow is Kiwi. No Sparrow is Parrot. Conclusions: I. All Parrot being Kiwi is a possibility. II. Some Owl is not Sparrow.Solution
No Parrot is Sparrow (E) + Some Sparrow is Kiwi (I) + → Some Parrot is not Kiwi (O*) → Probable conclusion → All Parrot may be Kiwi (A). Hence conclusion I follows. A few Owl is Sparrow → Some Owl is Bow (I). Hence conclusion II does not follow.
Highest nitrogen content among edible oil cakes is found in
The branch of Horticulture that deals with the cultivation of vegetables is called
When plant cells are placed in hypertonic solution, they become____
The law of limiting factors’ was proposed by
Among the mentioned oilseed crops, which one demonstrates the process of "gonophore formation" where the ovary transforms into a peg-like structure to f...
Kaolinite is a………………………………type of silicate clay mineralÂ
Foragial types of legs are found in _____ insect.Â
Which of the following is not a stem modification?
The great Irish famine was caused byÂ
Which scheme aims to promote the use of bio-pesticides and bio-agents for pest control?