Question
In the question below there are three statements
followed by two conclusions I and II. You have to take the three given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the three statements disregarding commonly known facts. Statements: A few Owl is Sparrow. Some Sparrow is Kiwi. No Sparrow is Parrot. Conclusions: I. All Parrot being Kiwi is a possibility. II. Some Owl is not Sparrow.Solution
No Parrot is Sparrow (E) + Some Sparrow is Kiwi (I) + β Some Parrot is not Kiwi (O*) β Probable conclusion β All Parrot may be Kiwi (A). Hence conclusion I follows. A few Owl is Sparrow β Some Owl is Bow (I). Hence conclusion II does not follow.
The Production Linked Incentive (PLI) 2.0 scheme, emphasized in recent policy cycles, introduced a "Value Addition" criteria. What is the primary object...
The Phillips curve shows the trade-off between ----- and -----?
In two commodity worlds if one good is inferior then the other must be
For a frequency distribution if Coefficient of variation is 5, standard deviation is 2 and Karl Pearsonβs coefficient of skewness is 0.5, the value of...
What is the supply curve of a firm in Perfect Competition?
The primary deficit in a government budget will be zero, when _______
If X(bar) = 25, Y(bar) = 120, bxy = 2. Find the value of X when Y=130?
A production function Q = f(K, L) is homogeneous of degree n. Euler's theorem applied to this function states that:
Whenrxy>0,thenbyxandbxyareboth:
...As per the Economic Survey 2025-26, India's Foreign Exchange Reserves as of January 2026 provided an import cover of approximately: