Question
have to take the three given statements to be true even
if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the three statements disregarding commonly known facts. Statements: None of the rubber are boards. Every board is plants. Some plants are papers Conclusions: I. Few rubber are papers. II. Few papers are boardsSolution
None of the rubber are boards (E) + Every board is plants (A) → Some plants are not rubber (O*). Some plants are papers (I) → Conversion → Some papers are plants (I) + Some plants are not rubber (O*) → No conclusion. Hence neither conclusion I nor II follow.
A wagering agreement is __________
Section 287 provides that in every summary trial where the accused does not plead guilty, the Magistrate shall—
Which of the following is not provided under S.89 of CPC?
Which constitutional provision allows Parliament to legislate on a State List matter when two or more States request Parliament to do so?
X and Y agree to start a business using forged documents. Before any action is taken towards obtaining the documents, they are arrested. Under Section 6...
Under what circumstances does the mandate of an arbitrator terminate and a substitution occur?
In which case did the Court held that when a contract is valid no doubt of it being cancelled arises and when it is void ab initio then also no option ...
When was the Competition Commission of India established?
Which section of the Companies Act delas with the provisions relating to Loans to Directors etc.?
Which of the following Article of constitution guarantees property as a constitutional right?
Relevant for Exams:
