Question
In the question below there are three statements
followed by two conclusions I and II. You have to take the three given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the four statements disregarding commonly known facts. Statements: 34% raisins are cashews No cashews are almonds A few almonds are nuts Conclusions: I. No cashew is a nut II. Some raisins are almondsSolution
No cashews are almonds (E) + A few almonds are nuts (I) → Some nuts are not cashews (O*). Hence conclusion I does not follow. 34% raisins are cashews (I) + No cashews are almonds (E) → Some raisins are not almonds (O). Hence conclusion II does not follow.
Which category under the PM Mudra Yojana allows for the highest loan amount, and what is the maximum loan limit?
What is the primary aim of the National Curriculum Framework for School Education (NCF-SE)?
Which region is mentioned as the host of the WHO Global Traditional Medicine Centre in the Gujarat Declaration?
How many industrial nodes/cities have been approved under the National Industrial Corridor Development Programme (NICDP)?
As per RBI guidelines, ‘Bulk Deposit’ in the case of RRBs mean a Single Term Deposit of _______ and above.
Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 came into force with effect from?
Who among the following can be the beneficiary of PM Kisan Maan Dhan Yojana?
The concept of diminishing marginal utility implies that:
Consider the following statements regarding the Sovereign Gold Bonds (SGBs) :
- They are substitutes for holding physical gold in which Inves...
Which of the following areas are challenging and need fresh initiatives for development in rural India?
(1) Development of human resources
...