Question
In the question below there are three statements
followed by three conclusions I, II and III. You have to take the three given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the three statements disregarding commonly known facts. Statements: Only a few Opposite are Behind No Front is Behind A few Behind are Under Conclusions: I. No Front is Under II. A few Under are not Front III. All Opposite can be BehindSolution
No Front is Behind (E) + A few Behind are Under (I) → Some Under are not Front (O). Hence conclusion I does not follow but conclusion II follows. Only a few Opposite are Behind → Some Opposite are Behind (I). Hence conclusion III does not follow.
Under the Industrial Relations Code, 2020, what is the minimum number of workmen required in an establishment for standing orders to be applicable?
What does Dictum mean?
In which one among the following cases the Supreme Court of India said that 'it is not an absolute rule of law that dying declaration must be corroborat...
What can a person do if they are aggrieved by an order made under section 3 of the the Occupational Safety, Health and Working Conditions Code?
What is the period of limitation for filing a suit under Section 113 of the Limitation Act?Â
Every company shall prepare and keep at its registered office books of account and other relevant books and papers and financial statement for every ___...
Under the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Section 8 deals with:
Section 54 of LLP Act, 2008, mandates maintenance of which register by an LLP?Â
Under Section 17 of the Credit Information Companies (Regulation) Act, 2005, a borrower, X, requests correction of inaccurate credit information maintai...
According to Roscoe Pound, law should be studied as: