Question
In the question below there are three statements
followed by three conclusions I, II and III. You have to take the three given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the three statements disregarding commonly known facts. Statements: 44% Q are P A few R are S Only S are U A few R are Q Conclusions: I. All U can be Q II. A few R can be U III. 0% P are USolution
Only S are U → All U are S and U cannot have positive relation with anyone. Hence neither conclusion I nor II follow but conclusion III follows.
If A = 2, B = 4, C = 6, and so on, then the number value of PREVENT will be:
The headquarter of State Bank of India is located at:
What is Bragg's spectrometer primarily used to measure?
Which state organized a mega event of Ice Hockey in honour of Republic Day?
The concept of 'Freedom of Press' is protected under which article of the Indian Constitution?
Who founded the Kuchipudi Art Academy in 1963 to promote the Kuchipudi dance form?
Consider the following statements:
Assertion (A): In the visible spectrum of light, red light has more energy than green light.
Reason (R)...
Who is the first woman in India to don the second highest rank i.e. Lieutenant General of Indian Armed Forces?
What penalty did SEBI impose on Jai Anmol Ambani in the RHFL case?
Who is the Principal Scientific Advisor to the Government of India?