Question
In the question below there are three statements
followed by three conclusions I, II and III. You have to take the three given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the three statements disregarding commonly known facts. Statements: 44% Q are P A few R are S Only S are U A few R are Q Conclusions: I. All U can be Q II. A few R can be U III. 0% P are USolution
Only S are U → All U are S and U cannot have positive relation with anyone. Hence neither conclusion I nor II follow but conclusion III follows.
Where neither party makes any appropriation, how shall the payment be applied in discharge of the debts?
As per the provisions of the IRDA Act with respect to the tenure of office of the chairperson and other persons, no person shall hold office as a Chairp...
As per the Motor Vehicle Act an Authorised insurer needs to have a certificate granted by?
If offence is punishable with fine only, the period of limitation for taking cognizance of it shall be
Which section of the IRDA Act delas with the Administrative Powers of the Chairperson?
When a company needs additional capital and keeps the voting rights of shareholders proportionally balanced, the company_______?
The term International Law was first coined by-
Which section of the Insurance Act deals with the provisions relating to the restrictions on the opening of a new place of business?
Where any person is a financial creditor as well as an operational creditor as per the IBC, 2016______________________
Which of the following section of Cr.p.C. provides for the requirement of confirmation by the High Court of an order of death sentence passed by session...