Question
In the question below there are three statements
followed by three conclusions I, II and III. You have to take the three given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the three statements disregarding commonly known facts. Statements: A few Apple are Kiwi Only a few Kiwi is Mango Only Mango is Pear Conclusions: I. No Apple is Pear II. A few Apple is Mango III. All Mango can be KiwiSolution
Only Mango is Pear → All Pear are Mango and Pear can have negative relation with anyone. Hence conclusion I follows but conclusion III does not follow. A few Apple are Kiwi (I) + Only a few Kiwi is Mango (I) → No conclusion. Hence conclusion II does not follow.
The Court of a Chief Judicial Magistrate may pass any sentence authorised by law except __________________________
Combination notifications must be made to the CCI within:Â
What is the minimum age of Transport Vehicle driver license?
Consider the following statements regarding the definition of "Public Servant" under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988:
Statement 1: A publi...
According to the Code on Social Security, 2020 how are establishments covered under this Code required to be registered?
Section 10 of CPC is related to:
_____________ is made by words written
Under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, cheque dishonour offence completes when:
The parties may agree to resolve their disputes by fast track procedure _____
If a prospectus has been issued with intent to defraud the applicants for the securities of a company or any other person or for any fraudulent purpose,...