Question
In the question below there are three statements
followed by three conclusions I, II and III. You have to take the three given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the three statements disregarding commonly known facts. Statements: Some item are food. Only item are menu. Only few tip are food. Conclusions: I. Some food are menu. II. Some item are tip. III. All tip are food.Solution
Only item are menu → All menu are item and menu cannot have any positive relation with anyone. Hence conclusion I does not follow. Only few tip are food (I) + [Some item are food (I) → Conversion] → Some food are item (I) → No conclusion. Hence conclusion II does not follow. Only few tip are food → Some tip are food (I). Hence conclusion III does not follow.
Agreement is defined in Section _____ of the Indian Contract Act, 1872.
In computing the period of limitation for an application to set aside an award, the time requisite for obtaining a copy of the award shall be __________?
Motive, preparation, previous or subsequent conduct is covered under which section of BSA?
In a murder investigation, circumstantial evidence shows that the accused's conduct immediately following the commission of the crime—specifically his...
The Schedule of Limitation Act, 1963 contains-
As per the Limitation Act, 1963, what is the time period for the acquisition of easement by prescription?
The provision governing counter claim is covered under which of the following orders of CPC?
Under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002, when a magistrate passes an order for possession of secured assets, what is the nature of the magistrate's f...
Ratio Decidendi means _______
Under Section 13(3)-(4), what happens when a challenge to an arbitrator is rejected?