Question
In the question below there are three statements
followed by two conclusions I and II. You have to take the three given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the three statements disregarding commonly known facts. Statements: Some Tears are Eyes. Only Eyes are Paper. Some Eyes are not Ear. Conclusion: I. Some Paper are Tears. II. Some Ear can be Tears.ÂSolution
Only Eyes are Paper → All Paper are Eyes and Paper cannot have any positive relation with anyone. Hence conclusion I does not follow. Some Tears are Eyes (I) + Some Eyes are not Ear (O) → Probable conclusion → Some Ear can be Tears (I). Hence conclusion II follows.
A contract is entered into under duress where one party threatened the other with loss of business if the agreement wasn't signed. The other party signs...
Mr. Sharma, a sole proprietor, entered into an oral agreement with a vendor for purchase of office furniture worth ₹2 lakhs, with delivery to be made ...
XYZ Ltd., a listed entity, has only 2 independent directors on its 12-member Board. Audit Committee is formed with 2 independent and 1 executive directo...
The registered office clause of memorandum of association contains
The preference shares should be redeemed with in a period of
What is the minimum number of members required to form a public company?
Which of the following is an exception to the doctrine of privity of contract rule _______________?
A contract entered between two companies was found to lack mutual consent. Under the Indian Contract Act, which essential element of a valid contract is...
As per the Companies Act and related Rules, every private company is required to issue securities only in a dematerialised form and facilitate demateria...
As per the Companies Act, 2013 a Company means_____________
Relevant for Exams:
