Question
Statements:Â Â Â Â Â Â All pink are red.
                               All red are orange. Conclusions:      I. All pink are orange.                                II. Some orange are red. In each question below are given two statements followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to take the two given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the two given statements, disregarding commonly known facts.ÂSolution
All pink are red (A) + All red are orange (A) ⇒ All pink are orange (A). Hence, conclusion I will follow. All red are orange (A) ⇒ conversion ⇒ Some orange are red(I). Hence, conclusion II will also follow
Communication made in good faith as per S. 93 of IPC should be:
A bailiff acting under an order of the Court does that act without the knowledge that the Court has no jurisdiction to do so____________
Indira Sawhney v. Union of India (1992) laid down which principle?Â
A plea questioning the jurisdiction of the arbitral tribunal
Which of the following offences is not covered by the general defence mentioned under S. 94 that is act compelled by threats of IPC?
Who is a doli capax?
S.R. Bommai v. Union of India (1994) is associated with:Â
Which of the following best describes Parliament's exclusive power under the Constitution, subject to Article 246A?
Section 74 and 75 of the Evidence Act have been combined into one section under which of the following sections in the BharatiyaSakshayaAdhiniyam?
General Explanations are provided under which chapter of IPC?