Question
Statements: Some bikes are cars. Some cars
are motors. No motor is cycle. Conclusions: I. Some cycle are definitely bikes. II. At least some motors are bikes. III. All cars being bikes is a possibility. IV. No bike is cycle. In each question below are given some statements followed by some conclusions numbered I, II, etc are given. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the given statements, disregarding commonly known facts.Solution
Some bikes are cars(I) + Some cars are motors(I) ⇒ No conclusion. Hence conclusion I, II and IV does not follow but conclusion I and IV will form a complementary pair. Hence either conclusion I or IV follow. Some bikes are cars(I) ⇒ Conversion ⇒ Some cars are bikes(I) ⇒ Probable conclusion ⇒ All cars being bikes is a possibility.(A). Hence conclusion III follows. ALTERNATE SOLUTION: Minimal possibility: 
The 'Crowding Out' effect of fiscal policy refers to:
The JAM (Jan-Dhan, Aadhaar, and Mobile) trinity has significantly contributed to which of the following in India?
If money is neutral,
What will be the value of P(not E) if P(E) = 0.07?
 If f(x) is continuous for all real values of x and f(x) takes on only rational values, then if f(1)=1, the value of f(0) is
The J-Curve effect describes:
Which of the following is a key criticism of the Peacock-Wiseman hypothesis?
  Consider the following production function
Y = F(K,AL) = K1/3(AL)2/3
Calculate the Golden state level of capita...
For which of the following consumption functions, the value of income multiplier, k=5?
If the endowment of some resource increases, the industry that uses that resource most intensively will increase its output while the other in...