Question

In the question below, a premise is given, followed by statements that may or may not weaken the assertion made in the premise. Read the question and answer it as per the individual direction mentioned. The city administration has proposed a ban on all private vehicles in the central business district (CB

  • D in order to reduce air pollution. The administration argues that this ban will significantly cut down emissions and improve air quality. However, critics argue that unless the administration also improves public transport infrastructure before the ban, the influx of people who depend on private vehicles will overwhelm the existing system. Thus, the proposal must include provisions to increase the capacity and efficiency of public transport before banning private vehicles. Which of the following statements weaken the argument that the proposal must improve public transport before implementing the ban?
A Similar bans in other cities have successfully reduced air pollution even without major improvements in public transport.
B Traffic congestion in the CBD is caused mainly by commercial vehicles, not private vehicles.
C A recent survey shows that a majority of daily commuters are willing to switch to cycling or walking if private vehicles are banned.
D The administration has already allocated funds to expand the public bus fleet next year.
E None of the above.
Practice Next

More Strong and Weak Argument Questions

Relevant for Exams:

Hey! Ask a query