Question
Statement: Turkey is a country that always innovates new
ideas to trouble India. But this time it's going to create problems for many South-East Asian countries. Russia is one of the biggest crude oil suppliers to Asian countries. The oil trading route between Russia and the Indian Ocean is "the western part of Russia→ the Black sea → the Bosphorus strait→ the Mediterranean sea→ the Suez canal→ the Arabian sea→ the Indian ocean." The Bosphorus strait is controlled by Turkey. Since December 1 Turkey has stopped all the oil tankers, which are coming from Russia, at the strait.Assumptions:I) Russia will drop a nuclear bomb on Turkey.II) The affected countries will build a network of oil pipelines to continue the oil supply from Russia.III) Oil prices will increase in the affected countries.IV) Countries will completely shift to Electric vehicles, to immune themselves against shortage of crude oil. In the following question a statement is given which is followed by four assumptions. Consider the statement and decide which of the given assumption is implicit.Solution
Assumption (I)
"Russia will drop a nuclear bomb on Turkey."
"Russia will drop a nuclear bomb on Turkey." statement doesn't mention anything that can confirm or refute this option.
Moreover, this is not an appropriate solution to the problem.
Hence, this assumption is not implicit
Assumption (II)
"The affected countries will build a network of oil pipelines to continue oil supply from Russia."
As the main concern is the supply of oil, we can assume that the affected countries can build such network.
So, this can be assumed through the statement.
Hence, this assumption is implicit.
Assumption (III)
"Oil prices will increase in the affected countries."
It is given that Russia is one of the biggest crud oil suppliers to Asian countries. Any disruption in supply from the country will lead to a shortage of oil. If demand remains constant but supply decreases then it will result in a price hike.
Hence, this assumption is implicit
Assumption (IV)
"Countries will completely shift on Electric vehicle, to immune themselves against shortage of crud oil."
A complete shift on another source can't happen overnight.Â
The current need is a simple and immediate solution.
The statement doesn't mention anything that can confirm or refute this option.
Hence, this assumption is not implicit
The correct answer is option d i.e. "Only assumptions II and III implicit."
Ravi invested Rs. 18,000 in a business. After 8 months, Suresh joined with an investment of Rs. 22,000. If the total profit at the end of 2 years is Rs....
A’, ‘B’ and ‘C’ started a business by investing Rs. 8,000, Rs. 9,500, and Rs. 7,500, respectively such that ‘B’ invested for 2 months more...
A and B started a retail store with initial investments in the ratio 8:9 and their annual profits were in the ratio 2:3. If A invested the money for 6 m...
A and B invested Rs.5000 and Rs.9000 in a business respectively and after 4 months B withdrawn 50% of his initial investment and again after 5 months he...
A and B started a business with investments in the ratio of 6:7 respectively. If after one year, the profit earned by A is Rs. 3000, then find the total...
Amit and Ben started a partnership by investing Rs.3600 and Rs.4500, respectively. Amit's investment period is 'x' months, while Ben's investment period...
A businessman earned Rs. 50,000 profit. He invested 30% of this profit in stocks, donated 10% of the remaining to charity, and spent 15% of the rest on ...
N initiates a business, and after 3 months, D also becomes a part of the business. The initial investment of N and D is in the ratio of 3:2, respectivel...
Three friends A, B and C entered into partnership by investing Rs. 15X, Rs. (3X + 26) and Rs. (1000 – 6X) respectively. The ratio of the time period o...
‘A’ and ‘B’ invested Rs. 4600 and Rs. 2800, respectively in a business, together. After 6 months, ‘A’ withdrew 25% of his initial investment...