Question
The question given below consists of two statements
numbered I and II given below it. You have to decide whether the data provided in the statements are sufficient to answer the question. Read all the statements and give answer. Six persons D, E, F, G, H and I are sitting in a row facing north. Who among the following sits at the extreme left end? I. I sits to the immediate left of D, who sits third to the right of E. G sits to the immediate left of H, who is not adjacent to E. II. F sits third to the left of G, who sits adjacent to H. E sits second to the left of I. D does not sit at any end.Solution
Now, from statement I, Now, I sits to the immediate left of D, who sits third to the right of E. G sits to the immediate left of H, who is not adjacent to E. So, the possible arrangement is EÂ Â Â Â Â Â Â Â FÂ Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â IÂ Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â DÂ Â Â Â Â Â Â Â GÂ Â Â Â Â Â Â Â H Â So, E sits at the extreme left end. Therefore, statement I alone is sufficient. Now, from statement II, Now, F sits third to the left of G, who sits adjacent to H. E sits second to the left of I. D does not sit at any end. So, we have EÂ Â Â Â Â Â Â Â FÂ Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â IÂ Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â DÂ Â Â Â Â Â Â Â GÂ Â Â Â Â Â Â Â H So, E sits at the extreme left end. Therefore, statement II alone is sufficient.
A suit to obtain a decree that a mortgagor shall be absolutely debarred of his right to redeem the mortgaged property is called a
Ejusdem generis is___
Under which section of the Indian Evidence Act the principle of "Res Gestae" is  given:Â
Which of the following is true about interest of unborn in transfer of property?
As per the Motor Vehicles Act where the applicant does not pass the test; he may be permitted to re-appear for the test _________________
Which of the following is not an essential of partnership ?
To constitute a tort, there must be:
Section 111 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 introduces the offence of ___________________
The judgment of the Supreme Court in ‘Indian Steel and Wire Products v. State of ‘Madras, AIR 1968 SC 478, is a decision on:
Application for anticipatory bail may be made before: