Read the situation below and determine which combination of the given statements serves as a possible, logical reason(s) for the organization's sudden course of action. Situation: A dominant mobile application marketplace suddenly purged tens of thousands of independent software developers from its ecosystem overnight, rendering these small software studios completely unable to distribute their apps or collect user revenues. Statements (Potential Reasons): 1. International cybersecurity agencies and consumer protection bodies had recently issued formal warnings regarding a massive surge in unauthorized data tracking and spyware hidden within unverified applications on the marketplace. 2. The platform operator was launching its own proprietary suite of premium utility apps and sought to systematically eliminate low-cost, independent alternatives that diluted its direct subscription revenues. 3. The affected developers had failed to sign a newly mandated developer agreement and input updated global tax documentation by a hard deadline enforced that week.

Analysis: The situation details a massive, abrupt action where a major platform provider cuts off access for thousands of independent actors. We must evaluate whether each statement provides a viable, standalone business or legal rationale for this sweeping decision: Statement 1 is a possible reason (External Regulatory Pressure). If consumer watchdogs and cybersecurity agencies flag widespread malicious software on the store, the marketplace operator faces catastrophic reputational damage and potential legal liability. To protect its user base and comply with security expectations, the platform would logically execute a mass purge of suspicious or unverified developers. Statement 2 is a possible reason (Corporate Self-Interest / Monetization). Digital ecosystem operators frequently leverage their market dominance to stifle competition. If the platform wants to maximize profit from its own in-house premium apps, removing thousands of competing independent alternatives is a highly effective, albeit aggressive, corporate strategy to force users into their ecosystem. Statement 3 is a possible reason (Administrative Compliance Enforcement). Platforms operating on a global scale require strict adherence to evolving legal and tax codes. If thousands of developers miss a critical deadline to update their documentation or sign a mandatory framework, automated system protocols or corporate legal teams will systematically suspend those accounts to avoid platform-wide compliance violations.