Question
Two statements are given followed by three conclusions
numbered I, II and III.Assuming the statements to be true, even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements. Statements All cakes are candles. Some cakes are jokers. Conclusions: I. Some candles are jokers. II. No joker is a candle. III. Some candles are cakes.Solution
Some cakes are jokers (I)тЖТ Conversion тЖТ Some jokers are cakes (I) + All cakes are candles (A) тЖТ Some jokers are candles (I) )тЖТ Conversion тЖТ Some candles are jokers (I). Hence conclusion I follows but conclusion II does not follow. All cakes are candles (A)тЖТ Conversion тЖТ Some candles are cakes (I). Hence conclusion III follows.
рджрд┐рдП рдЧрдП рдкреНрд░рддреНрдпреЗрдХ рдкреНрд░рд╢реНрди рдореЗрдВ рдПрдХ рд╣рд┐рдВрджреА рдХрд╛ рд╡рд╛рдХреНрдп рджрд┐рдпрд╛ рдЧрдпрд╛ я┐╜...
Formal job creation surged to 1.5 Lakhs.
ACCOUNTABILITY рдХреЗ рд▓рд┐рдП рд╕рд╣реА рд╣рд┐рдиреНрджреА рдкрд╛рд░рд┐рднрд╛рд╖рд┐рдХ рд╢рдмреНрдж рд╣реИ -
We will continuously take proactive initiatives to achieve this.
рд╡рд┐рдЬреНрдЮрд╛рди рдПрдХ рджреБрдзрд╛рд░реА рддрд▓рд╡рд╛рд░ рдХрд┐ рднрд╛рдВрддрд┐ рд╣реИред
рдмреИрдВрдХ рд╢рдмреНрджрд╛рд╡рд▓реА┬а рдХреЗ рдЕрдиреБрд╕рд╛рд░ hard money рдХрд╛ рд╣рд┐рдВрджреА рдкрд░реНрдпрд╛рдп рд╣реЛрддрд╛ рд╣реИ ред
. according to convenience рдХрд╛ рд╣рд┐рдиреНрджреА рдЕрд░реНрде рд╣реИ ?
рдирд┐рдореНрдирд▓рд┐рдЦрд┐рдд┬а рд╡рд┐рдХрд▓реНрдкреЛрдВ рдореЗрдВ рд╕реЗ junior clerk рд╢рдмреНрдж рдХрд╛ рдкрд░реНрдпрд╛рдп┬а рд╣реЛрддрд╛ ...
Gross Misconduct рдХреЗ рд▓рд┐рдП рд╕рд╣реА рд╣рд┐рдиреНрджреА рдкрд╛рд░рд┐рднрд╛рд╖рд┐рдХ рд╢рдмреНрдж рд╣реИ :
рдирд┐рдореНрдирд▓рд┐рдЦрд┐рдд рдореЗрдВ рд╕реЗ Abase рд╢рдмреНрдж рдХрд╛ рдЕрд░реНрде рдирд╣реАрдВ рд╣реИ ?