In which case did “Lord Atkin: hold that the circumstances of the transaction which resulted in the death of the declarant will be admissible if such transaction has some proximate effect.”
Pakala Narain Swamy v. Emperor 1939 in which Lord Atkin: held that the circumstances of the transaction which resulted in the death of the declarant will be admissible if such transaction has some proximate effect.
447.8× 441.2÷ 445= 44 × 44?
5 × 14 + 100 ÷ 4 = 62 + ?
√529 + √64 + 92 = ?
?% of 120 × 3√343 = 42 × 20
36 x 3.6 ÷ 0.5 ÷ ? = 64
(115 × 17 × 3)/(23 × 51) + ?3 = √169
4567.89 - 567.89 - 678.89 = ?
1220 ÷ 61 ÷ 5 + 450 of 20% - 70 = √ ?
(√121 + √196) × 7 =? × 5
96% of 4500 – 34% of 650 = ?