Question
In which case did “Lord Atkin: hold that the
circumstances of the transaction which resulted in the death of the declarant will be admissible if such transaction has some proximate effect.”Solution
Pakala Narain Swamy v. Emperor 1939 in which Lord Atkin: held that the circumstances of the transaction which resulted in the death of the declarant will be admissible if such transaction has some proximate effect.
More Other Laws and Acts Questions
[{(1296 ÷ 18) ÷ 12} ÷ 6] + 82 + √625 = ?
10% of 100 + 14 = ?% of 120
- What will come in the place of question mark (?) in the given expression?
If 1.123 × 3.211 = 3.122 + ______________, then the number in blank space is
9 × 4 ? ÷ 16 = 144
(60/15) × 25 + 15 2 – 18% of 200 = ? 2
(3984 ÷ 24) x (5862 ÷ 40) = ?
? = 6.25% of 240 + 252 + 172 – 16 × 17
53 – 8 = ? + 126
