Question
A software developer created a program that allowed
unauthorized access to a bank's network to expose vulnerabilities. The developer released this program without permission claiming it was for "ethical hacking." Under the IT Act, which statements are correct? Statement 1: The developer can claim exemption under Section 66 because the intent was to expose vulnerabilities. Statement 2: Unauthorized access remains an offence under Section 66 regardless of the stated purpose. Statement 3: The developer can be prosecuted under Section 66 for unauthorized access. Statement 4: Section 66 provides a defense if the access was for security testing purposes. Which statements are correct?Solution
Unauthorized access is prohibited regardless of intent—Statement 2 is correct. Prosecution under Section 66 is possible—Statement 3 is correct. Statement 1 is incorrect—good intent does not exempt unauthorized access. Statement 4 is incorrect—Section 66 provides no such defense. Statements 2 and 3 are correct.
Consider the following statements:
(i) Haiderpur Wetland of Western Uttar Pradesh (UP) has been recognized as 47th Ramsar site in the country and...
In the OBICUS survey, what does U stand for?
In economics, what does 'Budget Surplus' mean?
Which of the folloinwg statement is not correct about Urban Co-operative Banks (UCBs):
Of which of the following organisations is India NOT a member?
In 2023, Prime Minister Narendra Modi, on the occasion of which of the following day paid tributes to Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj, and unveiled a grand ...
CAPTCHA is a type of security measure known as challenge-response authentication. What does P stand for?
The first railway line in India was laid in the year 1853 from Bombay to _______.
In which year was The Reserve Bank of India was established?
Select the option that shows the correct match of an organisation and its headquarters.