Question

In N.P. Thirugnanam
v.Dr. R.J. Mohan Rao the Court was of the view that____________

A A plaintiff not ready and willing to perform his part of the contract would not be entitled to a specific performance decree
B When a contract is valid no doubt of it being cancelled arises and when it is void ab initio then also no option of cancelling it arises as it is not present in the eyes of law
C Only fact to be proved by appellant is that they held a valid title to the property and were entitled to the property
D Minor who entered into a contract by making a false representation about his age, though not liable under the contract, may be required in equity to return the benefit he received
Practice Next

Relevant for Exams:

Hey! Ask a query