Question
 In which of the following cases it was held that the
limitation act does not apply to quasi-judicial bodies?Solution
Popat Bahiru Govardhane v. Land Acquisition Officer, 2013 ü In the present case, it was held by the Hon’ble Court that the limitation Act applies to courts and not to quasi-judicial authorities. ü Furthermore, it was held that the law of limitation may possibly austerely affect a particular party but, nonetheless has to be applied when the statute prescribes the same. ü Moreover, that the Court(s) are devoid of the power to extend the period of limitation on equitable grounds, even if the statutory provision may cause hardship or inconvenience to a particular party.
Which Article provides for the “Appointment of the Comptroller and Auditor-General of India”?Â
Golaknath v. State of Punjab (1967) held that:Â
Which of the following phrases is not part of the Preamble of the Indian Constitution?
A, a surgeon, knowing that a particular operation is likely to cause the death of Z, who suffers under the painful complaint, but not intending to caus...
Which of the following Sections of Indian Penal code provided for defences based on this maxim- “ De minimis non curat lex”?
      ...
Court of Justice is defined under which section of IPC?
As per Indian Penal Code Solitary Confinement is_____________
Nothing is an offence which is done in the exercise of right of private defence is mentioned under which section of the Indian Penal Code?
Is there any provision as to communication provided under the General Defences Indian Penal Code?
How many sections are there in BNS?Â
Relevant for Exams:
