Start learning 50% faster. Sign in now
Popat Bahiru Govardhane v. Land Acquisition Officer, 2013 ü In the present case, it was held by the Hon’ble Court that the limitation Act applies to courts and not to quasi-judicial authorities. ü Furthermore, it was held that the law of limitation may possibly austerely affect a particular party but, nonetheless has to be applied when the statute prescribes the same. ü Moreover, that the Court(s) are devoid of the power to extend the period of limitation on equitable grounds, even if the statutory provision may cause hardship or inconvenience to a particular party.
A Continuing Guarantee applies to_______________
In the case of Supreme Court Advocates on-Record Association and another Vs Union of India which of the following amendment to the constituti...
The superintendence of the National Investigating Agency shall vest in the ________________
Which ISO standard is related to quality management system?
A plaintiff while withdrawing the suit ____________
A person is presumed to be alive if it is shown that he was alive within________years.
A Permanent Lok Adalat is headed by?
Which Act was replaced by the RTI Act?
The State Government appoints public prosecutor after consultation with_______
Industrial trans fatty acids does not include