Question
In which of the following cases it was held that the
limitation act does not apply to quasi-judicial bodies?Solution
Popat Bahiru Govardhane v. Land Acquisition Officer, 2013 ü In the present case, it was held by the Hon’ble Court that the limitation Act applies to courts and not to quasi-judicial authorities. ü Furthermore, it was held that the law of limitation may possibly austerely affect a particular party but, nonetheless has to be applied when the statute prescribes the same. ü Moreover, that the Court(s) are devoid of the power to extend the period of limitation on equitable grounds, even if the statutory provision may cause hardship or inconvenience to a particular party.
Statements:
All jacket are coat.
All coat are blazzers.
All blazzers are shir...
Statements: Some cow are bull.
All bull are sheep.
Conclusions: I. All bull are cow.
...
Statements:
All summers are winters.
Only a few summers are spring.
Some springs are autumn.
No autumn is season.
...
Statements:
Only a few Adidas are Nike
All Nike are Puma
No Nike is a Reebok
Conclusions:
I. All Puma being Nike...
Statements:
Only year is month
No year is week
Some week are days
Conclusion:
I. Some days can be month
II. Some days are not year
III. Some week are month
In the question below there are three statements followed by two conclusions I and II. You have to take the three given statements to be true even if ...
Statements: All egg are hen.
Some hen are goat.
Conclusions I. Some hen are egg.
II. Some goat are egg.
...Statements:Some mugs are soaps.
Some soaps are taps.
Conclusions:I. Some taps are mugs.
II. No mugs is tap.
Statement:
Only car are bus.
No bus is train.
Only bike are train.
Conclusion:
I. No train is car.
II. S...
Conclusions:
I. Some Bikes are not Cars.
II. Every Cars can be Cycles.
Statements:
Relevant for Exams:
