Question
In case of___________________ it was held that the
object of this provision is to prevent courts of concurrent jurisdiction from simultaneously entertaining two parallel litigations in respect of the same dispute.Solution
National Institute of Mental Health & Neuro Sciences v C Parameshwara, 2005 This is one of the landmark cases in CPC concerning the principle of res-sub-judice and res-judicata as provided u/ss 10 and 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure 1908. S.10 of the Code, which deals with the principle of res sub judice, provides that no court shall proceed with the trial of a suit in which the matter in issue is directly and substantially in issue in a previously instituted suit between the same parties before another court of competent jurisdiction.
What is the position of box X with respect to box S?
Which of the following is false?
How many exams are scheduled before Saturday?
How many persons play between R and U?
Four of the following five are alike in a certain way and hence form a group, which among the following does not belong to that group?
Which of the following group represents the females in the group?
Who among the following born on 5th of February?
Who likes Mango?
who visits just before the one who has White?
Which of the following book is covered by Brown paper?