Question

    In case of___________________ it was held that the

    object of this provision is to prevent courts of concurrent jurisdiction from simultaneously entertaining two parallel litigations in respect of the same dispute.
    A National Institute of Mental Health & Neuro Sciences v C Parameshwara, 2005 Correct Answer Incorrect Answer
    B Bahrein Petroleum Co. Ltd. v PJ Pappu, 1966 Correct Answer Incorrect Answer
    C Angile Insulations v Davy Ashmore India Ltd., 1995 Correct Answer Incorrect Answer
    D Vidyodaya Trust v Mohan Prasad 2008 Correct Answer Incorrect Answer

    Solution

    National Institute of Mental Health & Neuro Sciences v C Parameshwara, 2005 This is one of the landmark cases in CPC concerning the principle of res-sub-judice and res-judicata as provided u/ss 10 and 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure 1908. S.10 of the Code, which deals with the principle of res sub judice, provides that no court shall proceed with the trial of a suit in which the matter in issue is directly and substantially in issue in a previously instituted suit between the same parties before another court of competent jurisdiction.  

    Practice Next
    More Other Laws and Acts Questions

    Relevant for Exams:

    ask-question