Question
In case of___________________ it was held that the
object of this provision is to prevent courts of concurrent jurisdiction from simultaneously entertaining two parallel litigations in respect of the same dispute.Solution
National Institute of Mental Health & Neuro Sciences v C Parameshwara, 2005 This is one of the landmark cases in CPC concerning the principle of res-sub-judice and res-judicata as provided u/ss 10 and 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure 1908. S.10 of the Code, which deals with the principle of res sub judice, provides that no court shall proceed with the trial of a suit in which the matter in issue is directly and substantially in issue in a previously instituted suit between the same parties before another court of competent jurisdiction. Â
Statements: R = S ≥ T, U < Q < W = T, U = Z > V
Conclusions:
I. R > U
II. S ≥ Z
 III. V < T
Statements:  W > O > E ≤ N > P; L ≥ U; P > Q = R > U
Conclusions:
I. Â N > U
II. Â P > U
III. Â P < L
IV....
In the question, assuming the given statements to be true, find which of the conclusion (s) among given two conclusions is /are definitely true and the...
Statement: X>Y≥W =Z ≥U; U<R, Z<T
Conclusions:
I. W > R
II. T > R
Which of the following symbols should replace the sign (*) and ($) respectively in the expression ' B ≥ T ≥ D = Q = S * V ≤ F $ H ' in order to ma...
In the question, assuming the given statements to be true, find which of the conclusion (s) among given three conclusions is /are definitely true and ...
Statements: P > Q ≤ R; Q ≥ O > S; T < S ≤ U
Conclusions:
I. T < R
II. U ≤ Q
III. P > U
...Statements: G < H ≤ I, V ≥ W = G, R ≥ I = A
Conclusions :I. R > G  II. A ≥ H   III. H ≤ R
...Statements: V = W ≤ X > R ≥ O; C < O; F = X
Conclusion: I. F > R II. X > C
- Statements: F > G ≥ H = I < J = K ≤ L ≤ M = N
Conclusions:
I. M > J
II. G ≥ N
III. J = M
Relevant for Exams:
