Start learning 50% faster. Sign in now
In H.P. Puttaswamy v Thimmamma & Ors, the Supreme Court considered whether the presence of the purchaser of an immovable property is required before the concerned body under the Act when a deed is registered in conveyance in compliance with the Act. The issue in this case concerned a 4,500-square-foot property in the village of Hittanahalli Koppalu in the Malavallu Taluk of Karnataka (the “Suit Property”). It was discovered that this property had been the subject of two separate selling deeds. On March 31, 1989, the appellant filed a lawsuit to be recognized as the rightful owner of the suit property. The plaintiff’s deed had brought the appellant into possession of the suit as a tenant and later as a purchaser. The Supreme Court cited section 32 of the act, stating that, aside from the exceptions established by Sections 31,88, and 89 of the Act, if a document is being registered, regardless of whether it is mandatory or optional, it would require either: 1) some person signing the agreement or claiming rights under it, or 2) such a person’s representative or assignee, or 3) by the agent or representative of such a person who has a duly approved power of attorney to appear before the relevant authorities under the Act. A simple reading of Section 32 reveals that neither party to a sale deed is required to appear before the relevant authority under the Act. And, because the conveyance deed did not fall within the exceptions set forth in section 32, the Supreme Court dismissed the case without interfering with the High Court’s decision, clarifying that Section 32 does not require the presence of both parties to a sale deed when it is submitted for registration to the appropriate authority under the Act.
The ratio of cost price and selling price of a shirt is 7:8 respectively. The shirt was marked up by 25% above its cost price, and sold after giving Rs....
A seller marked the price of an item at Rs. 4,000. The seller gave successive discounts of (z + 4)% and (z - 4)% to a customer. If the customer paid Rs....
'Ankit' and 'Baldev' started a business and invested Rs. 48,000 and Rs. 54,000, respectively. Find the profit share of 'Baldev' out of total profit of R...
A man has 20 liters of pure alcohol. To make a 75% profit while selling it at the original cost price of alcohol, how many liters of water should he mix...
A shopkeeper buys toffees at the rate of 14 for 1 rupee. At what rate (how many toffees per rupee) should he sell them to earn a 40% profit?
The profit earned when article is sold for Rs. 1280 is 23 times of the loss incurred when it is sold for Rs. 800.Find the CP?
Profit percentage received on a product when sold for Rs. 240 is equal to the percentage loss incurred when the same product is sold for Rs. 240. Find t...
An item was sold at a 22% loss. If the selling price had been increased by Rs. 1,850, there would have been a 15% profit instead. Determine the original...
A shopkeeper sold an article after offering two successive discounts of 20% and 30%, respectively. If the marked price and the cost price of the article...