Question
In H.P. Puttaswamy v Thimmamma & Ors, the Supreme Court
discussed Section ……. Of Registration ActSolution
In H.P. Puttaswamy v Thimmamma & Ors, the Supreme Court considered whether the presence of the purchaser of an immovable property is required before the concerned body under the Act when a deed is registered in conveyance in compliance with the Act. The issue in this case concerned a 4,500-square-foot property in the village of Hittanahalli Koppalu in the Malavallu Taluk of Karnataka (the “Suit Property”). It was discovered that this property had been the subject of two separate selling deeds. On March 31, 1989, the appellant filed a lawsuit to be recognized as the rightful owner of the suit property. The plaintiff’s deed had brought the appellant into possession of the suit as a tenant and later as a purchaser. The Supreme Court cited section 32 of the act, stating that, aside from the exceptions established by Sections 31,88, and 89 of the Act, if a document is being registered, regardless of whether it is mandatory or optional, it would require either: 1)   some person signing the agreement or claiming rights under it, or 2)   such a person’s representative or assignee, or 3)   by the agent or representative of such a person who has a duly approved power of attorney to appear before the relevant authorities under the Act. A simple reading of Section 32 reveals that neither party to a sale deed is required to appear before the relevant authority under the Act. And, because the conveyance deed did not fall within the exceptions set forth in section 32, the Supreme Court dismissed the case without interfering with the High Court’s decision, clarifying that Section 32 does not require the presence of both parties to a sale deed when it is submitted for registration to the appropriate authority under the Act.
- A Man sold 2 articles for ₹4,000 each, gained 10% on one and lost 20% on the other. What is the total gain or loss rounded to the nearest integer? 
- A trader buys 150 kg of rice at ₹20 per kg and 100 kg of rice at ₹25 per kg. He mixes them and sells the mixture at ₹27 per kg. What is his overal... 
- A retailer sells two items, K and L. He gains a 12% profit on item K, which costs Rs. 3600. If the overall profit from selling both items is 15%, what i... 
- Mohini went shopping to buy a shirt with some money. She selected a shirt, which is marked Rs.200 higher price than the money she had. But shopkeeper g... 
- The wheel of an engine 5 (1/9) meters in circumference makes five revolutions in 4 seconds. Find the speed of the train in km per hour. 
- An item was marked 60% above its cost price and sold after giving a discount of Rs. 600. If the selling price of the item is Rs. 1800, find the cost pri... 
- A & B jointly made a profit of Rs.1650 and they decided to share it such that 1/3 of A's profit is equal to 2/5 of B's profit. Then profit of B is 
- A shopkeeper sold a school bag at a profit of 45%. Had he sold the school bag at 25% profit he would have earned Rs.148 less. Find the cost price of the... 
- A shopkeeper sold a school bag at a profit of 55%. Had he sold the school bag at 35% profit he would have earned Rs.188 less. Find the cost price of the... 
- Kailash went to purchase a chimney, the shopkeeper told him to pay 26% tax if he asked the bill. Kailash manages to get the discount of 12% on the actu...