Start learning 50% faster. Sign in now
A limitation of the value at risk (VaR) approach to measuring risk is that it fails to specify the maximum loss that could occur. VAR statistic has three components - a relatively high level of confidence (typically either 95% or 99%), a time period (a day, a month or a year) and an estimate of investment loss (expressed either in absolute or percentage terms). However, at a 99% confidence level what VAR really means is that in 1% of cases (that would be 2-3 trading days in a year with daily VAR) the loss is expected to be greater than the VAR amount. Value At Risk does not say anything about the size of losses within this 1% of trading days and by no means does it say anything about the maximum possible loss.
Less of 10 per cent of (1)/ global climate finance and (2)/ only 1.2 per cent of humanitarian (3) /funding reaches local actors in cities.(4)
Interchange the words in the two sentences so that both the sentences become grammatically and contextually correct.
I. Sri Lanka may need (A...
The watchman was kind(1)/ enough to inform us (2)/about the conspiracy but (3)/declined to name the person behind it.(4)
Given below is a sentence with or without an error. The error, if any, is in one part of the sentence. Choose the correct part which contains the error...
All these things happen/ because she do not / pay heed to my words.
The most effective measure to keep (1)/ our roads safe is enforcement of rules (2)/ with zero tolerance to any violate rule. (3)/ No error. (4)
In the below question, a sentence is given, divided into five parts (A), (B), (C), (D) and (1). There is an error in one of the parts, which makes the s...
You should avoid (A)/to look into these matters as (B)/they are complicated and could be (C)/handled only by a professional (D).
The tragedy(1) has highlighted(2) the lack of emphasis(3) on safety in the way such events are organised(4). No Error (5).
...