Question
A few weeks ago (A) / the central bank had reduced the
reverse repo (B) / by a larger percentage than the repo to (C) / decrease the incentive to banks to keep money with RBI (D) In each of the questions given below, a sentence is given which is divided into four parts A, B, C and D. These four parts may or may not be in their correct position. The sentence is then followed by options with the correct combination of parts that should replace each other in order to make the sentence grammatically and contextually correct. Find the correct combination of parts that replace each other. If the sentence is correct as it is, select lsquo;5rsquo; as your option.Solution
We cannot start with D and hence we eliminate option 3. We also eliminate option 4 because ldquo;A few weeks ago decrease the incentive to bankshellip;rdquo; does not make any sense. Similarly, option 1 and option 2 also result in grammatically illogical sentences. The question sentence is correct as it is. The correct sentence is - A few weeks ago, the central bank had reduced the reverse repo by a larger percentage than the repo to decrease the incentive to banks to keep money with RBI.
A group of words which forms part of a sentence is a clause if it contains
When a compromise or arrangement is proposed between a company and its creditors or its members the Tribunal on an application of _______
Which of the following activities would require an environmental impact assessment (EIA) in India?
Which is correct statement with respect to Liquidation Estate?
Dunlop Pneumatic Tyre Co. Ltd. V. Selfridge & Co. provides for _______________
Subhadra and Ors. V. Thankam it was held that ____________
The Certificate of Registration of central recordkeeping agency, pension fund, point of presence, etc. is issued by _______________ as per section 27 of...
According to section 32 of the Specific Relief Act an instrument can be cancelled in part when
Under the Specific Relief Act, a suit for recovery of possession can be filed _____________
Which of the following is an exception to the concept that agreements by way of wager are void?