Answer-In the questions given below, a sentence is given, divided into parts which when rearranged will for...

Question

Accepted Answer

Part E is the odd part. A opens the sentence by identifying the specific subject  the arbitration clause embedded within.  C follows directly by telling us what happened to this clause  the contract was deemed unconscionable by the tribunal.  B continues naturally from C by providing the legal consequence of that finding  rendering it unenforceable under the prevailing.  D concludes by specifying the legal doctrine under which it was rendered unenforceable  doctrines of equitable relief and procedural fairness. So the logical chain is A  C  B  D, forming  The arbitration clause embedded within the contract was deemed unconscionable by the tribunal, rendering it unenforceable under the prevailing doctrines of equitable relief and procedural fairness. E is the odd part because it introduces a completely separate and broader academic debate  legal scholars have long debated the ethics of mandatory arbitration  which is a general scholarly commentary and does not connect to the specific tribunal ruling, the unconscionability finding, or the enforceability question being discussed in the sentence. No other part references scholarly debate or the ethics of arbitration as a systemic practice. E operates at a different level of abstraction from the rest of the sentence and therefore cannot be logically integrated into the chain.

Detailed Solution

More Coherent paragraph Questions

Relevant for Exams:

Hey! Ask a query

Please Register/Login