Question
In the question below there are three statements
followed by two conclusions I and II. You have to take the three given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the three statements disregarding commonly known facts. Statements: Some Lower are Upper All Behind are Upper Only a few Upper are Opposite Conclusions: I. All Upper being Opposite is a possibility II. Some Behind are LowerSolution
Only a few Upper are Opposite β Some Upper are Opposite (I). Hence conclusion I does not follow. Some Lower are Upper (I) + [All Behind are Upper (A) β Some Upper are Behind (I) β No conclusion. Hence conclusion II does not follow.
Who sits third to the left of Bhaskar?
Four of the following five are alike in a certain way as per the given arrangement and hence form a group, which one of the following does not belong to...
Who among the following is an immediate neighbour of J?
How is U related to M?
Statements:
M < N = C; Q β₯ N > R; U β€ Q < P
Conclusions:
I. Q β₯ M
II. R < C
Who among the following are the immediate neighbours of Sonam?
Six girls T, U, V, W, X and Y are sitting around a circular table, facing the centre. Y is sitting third to the left of X. W is sitting to the immediate...
The girl who likes K is facing who among the following girls?
T, U, V, W and X are standing in a row facing north. W is the immediate neighbour of T and X. U is at the right of X and V is in the extreme right. Who ...
Which of the following pair of persons are immediate neighbors?