Question
In the question below there are three statements
followed by three conclusions I, II and III. You have to take the three given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the three statements disregarding commonly known facts. Statements: All Doctor is Lawyer. Only a few Doctor is Teacher. No Lawyer is Dentist. Conclusion: I. Some Teacher is not Dentist. II. All Teacher being Doctor is a possibility. III. No Doctor is Dentist.Solution
All Doctor is Lawyer (A) + No Lawyer is Dentist (E) → No Doctor is Dentist (E) → Conversion → No Dentist is Doctor (E) + Only a few Doctor is Teacher (I) → Some Teacher is not Dentist (O*). Hence conclusion I and III follow. Only a few Doctor is Teacher → All Teacher may be Doctor (A). Hence conclusion II follows.
The type of e-Commerce where consumer posts work online and businesses make offers is:
Under the PMEGP scheme, what is the maximum project cost permitted in the manufacturing sector?
Which item of revenue of the following is covered under Accounting Standard-9?
Which of the following is a sub-target under Priority Sector Lending for Agriculture for domestic commercial banks?
A trial balance is an internal financial report, critical to the book-keeping and accounting process. What purpose does a trial balance serve?
The instrument that evidences an acknowledgment of debt by a company is called a:
Which of the following is true?
Which of the following statement is incorrect?
The fundamental accounting equation, Assets = Liabilities + Equity, can be alternatively expressed as:
According to AS 3, "Cash Equivalents" are:
