Question
In the question below there are three statements
followed by two conclusions I and II. You have to take the three given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the three statements disregarding commonly known facts. Statements: Few cheap is expensive Some expensive is costly Mostly costly is extravagant Conclusions: I. No extravagant is cheap II. Some expensive is extravagantSolution
Few cheap is expensive (I) + Some expensive is costly (I) β No conclusion. Hence conclusion I does not follow. Some expensive is costly (I) + Mostly costly is extravagant (I) β No conclusion. Hence conclusion II does not follow.
What is the term of office for the Chief Information Commissioner, and what is the eligibility condition?
Which of the following does not constitute an offence under Section 152?Β
Five distinct verticals have been formulated to provide focused strategic direction to the activities of NABET. Which of the following is not one of those?
Under Section 45, a person is said to abet the doing of a thing in which of the following cases?
______________________ is a process by which a private, member-owned company, such as a co-op, or a mutual life insurance company, legally changes its s...
Banking company incorporated in India is required to create a reserve fund __________________ transfer to the reserve fund a sum equivalent to not less...
Where by a contract of sale, the seller purports to effect a β¦β¦β¦β¦β¦β¦β¦ the contract operates as an agreement to sell
...In which of the following cases did the Supreme Court hold that a confession must either admit in terms of the offence, or at any rate, substantially al...
Admission in civil cases is:
Which of the contracts cannot be specifically enforced?