Question
In the question below there are three statements
followed by two conclusions I and II. You have to take the three given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the three statements disregarding commonly known facts. Statements: No token is coupon Only coupon is wallet Some coupon is reward Conclusions: I. Some token is not reward II. Some reward is walletSolution
No token is coupon (E) + Some coupon is reward (I) β Some reward is not token (O*). Hence conclusion I does not follow. Only coupon is wallet β All wallet is coupon and wallet cannot have positive relation with anyone. Hence conclusion II does not follow.
A and B are jointly tried for extortion. A makes a confessional statement in court admitting to the crime and also implicating B as his co-conspirator. ...
Section 22 of the PC Act applies provisions of which Act to the proceedings?Β
Which of the following best describes the provision relating to driving a motor vehicle by a person without a valid driving licence under the Motor Vehi...
Who is responsible for reviewing compliance with the regulations and verifying the effectiveness of internal control systems, as per Reg 5H of SEBI (Pr...
Article 5β11 (Part II) contain citizenship provisions at commencement. Which of the following accurately describes the transitional effect of Article ...
A is in urgent need of money for marriage of his daughter therefore agrees to sale his house to B at a price lower than the market price. Is this agree...
A. V Dicey has written a famous book named____________?
What is the definition of "digital personal data" as per the Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023?
Who has the authority to declare dividends?
What is the membership requirement for the registration of a Trade Union of workers under the Industrial Relations Code?