Question
In the question below there are three statements
followed by two conclusions I and II. You have to take the three given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the four statements disregarding commonly known facts. Statements: Mostly geysers are gliders. No glider is a tap All taps are boilers Conclusions: I. Only taps are boilers II. Few geysers are TapsSolution
All taps are boilers (A) → I.I. → Some taps are boilers (I). Hence conclusion I does not follow. Mostly geysers are gliders (I) + No glider is a tap (E) → Some tap are not geysers (O). Hence conclusion II does not follow.
More Syllogism Questions
9, 21, 67, 273, 1371, ?
8 9 22 75 316 ?
...21 48 173 516 1245 2576 ?
...8 9 ? 57 164 945
...Identify the logic of the below given series and given answer.
Series I :: 81, 89, 116, 241, (A), 1915
Series II :: (B), 204, 208, 4...
15 , 33 , 71 , 150 , 307 , 625
2 5 10 ...
3456 1728 2592 6485 22680 102060
...10 6 5 8.5 16 ?
...3601 3602 1803 604 154 36
...
Relevant for Exams:
