Question
In the question below there are three statements
followed by two conclusions I and II. You have to take the three given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the four statements disregarding commonly known facts. Statements: Mostly geysers are gliders. No glider is a tap All taps are boilers Conclusions: I. Only taps are boilers II. Few geysers are TapsSolution
All taps are boilers (A) → I.I. → Some taps are boilers (I). Hence conclusion I does not follow. Mostly geysers are gliders (I) + No glider is a tap (E) → Some tap are not geysers (O). Hence conclusion II does not follow.
More Syllogism Questions
- Riya spent 40% of her income on groceries and 50% of the remaining on entertainment. If she saves Rs. 1800 after these expenses, what is the amount spent o...
- Priya bought a gadget at 40% discount on its listed price and later sold it by offering a 20% discount on the listed price. What was her profit percentage?
Who among the following goes immediately after D?
- Rohan can finish a certain task in 18 days, whereas Rohan and Karan together can complete it in 4.5 days. How many days will Karan alone take to complete t...
In which direction is Saurabh with respect to Nisha?
- The volume of a sphere is 288π cm³. What will be its surface area?
Which of the following file extension denotes Excel Spreadsheet?
In a programming each instruction corresponds to _________ processor action(s).
In the following question, select the missing number of the given series.
41, 44, 53, 80, ?, 404
Statements : P > Q < R = U ≤ V = S ≤ W ≥ X > I
Conclusions :
I. Q ≥ V
II. R ≤ W
Relevant for Exams:
