Question
In the question below there are three statements
followed by two conclusions I and II. You have to take the three given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the four statements disregarding commonly known facts. Statements: Mostly geysers are gliders. No glider is a tap All taps are boilers Conclusions: I. Only taps are boilers II. Few geysers are TapsSolution
All taps are boilers (A) → I.I. → Some taps are boilers (I). Hence conclusion I does not follow. Mostly geysers are gliders (I) + No glider is a tap (E) → Some tap are not geysers (O). Hence conclusion II does not follow.
What is the indicator for monitoring of Asset Quality in new Prompt Corrective Action by RBI for Scheduled Commercial Banks?
What is the minimum DSCR typically required by lenders?​
ABC Ltd’s purchases during the year were Rs 200000. The balance sheet shows an average accounts payable balance of Rs 15000. ABC’s payables ...
Identify the tagline of India Post Payment Bank ?
Which of the following is considered a spontaneous source of working capital?​
What is the risk weight of cash while calculating Risk Weighted Assets (RWA)?​
Sh Ajay Kumar Chaudhary who is appointed as a new Executive Director of RBI, was earlier designated as:
Which institution refinances RRBs and Cooperative Banks?​
Which of the following scenarios best illustrates operational risk?​
Basel III capital regulations are based on 3 mutually reinforcing pillars. These pillars are:
I.         Minimum Capital Standards <...