Question
In the question below are given some statements
followed by some conclusions. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be in variance with commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the given statements disregarding commonly known facts. Statements: No FG is a RT. Some RT are SW. All SW are QA. Only few QA are LM. Conclusions: I. Some RT are QA. II. Some LM are SW. III. All SW being FG is a possibility.Solution
Some RT are SW (I) + All SW are QA (A) β Some RT are QA (I). Hence conclusion I follows. All SW are QA (A) + Some QA are LM (I) β No conclusion. Hence conclusion II does not follow. No FG is a RT (E) + Some RT are SW (I) β Some SW are not FG (O*) β Probable conclusion β Some SW RT be FG (I). Hence conclusion III does not follow.
What is the proposed increase in the minimum amount for offering non-callable term deposits (TDs) based on the recent announcement by RBI?
Small Industries Development Bank of India (SIDBI) will partner with the Association of Microfinance Institutions of India (AMFI) to support women entre...
Which initiative was launched at the Fisheries Startup Conclave 2.0 in Hyderabad to support innovation in fisheries and aquaculture?
What boundary did the New Shepard spacecraft cross during its mission, marking the entry into space?
The Internal Ombudsman has been designated to the Credit Information Companies with effect from ________.
When was the first FIFA World Cup held?
Recently Richard Howard died, he was ________.
Ministry of Agriculture & Farmers Welfare has launched a new campaign for banks under Agri Infra Fund titled BHARAT (Banks Heralding Accelerated Rural &...
In the Global Hunger Index 2023, what is India's rank out of 125 countries, and what is its corresponding score?
What is the targeted number of educators to be empowered through AI Productivity Labs under the IndiaAI and Microsoft partnership?