Question
In the question below are given some statements
followed by some conclusions. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be in variance with commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the given statements disregarding commonly known facts. Statements: No FG is a RT. Some RT are SW. All SW are QA. Only few QA are LM. Conclusions: I. Some RT are QA. II. Some LM are SW. III. All SW being FG is a possibility.Solution
Some RT are SW (I) + All SW are QA (A) → Some RT are QA (I). Hence conclusion I follows. All SW are QA (A) + Some QA are LM (I) → No conclusion. Hence conclusion II does not follow. No FG is a RT (E) + Some RT are SW (I) → Some SW are not FG (O*) → Probable conclusion → Some SW RT be FG (I). Hence conclusion III does not follow.
The newly appointed chairman of National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development is…………………
Who first used the term "mutation" to describe heritable, sudden phenotypic changes in organisms?
What is the main objective of using a disc harrow in secondary tillage?
Which of the following is most appropriate for blank “b”?
The study of plant nutrition and growth and crop production in relation to soil management is known as
Cell is the fundamental structural and functional unit of all living organisms. It was first discovered by ____
Which of the following fruit is highly drought tolerant?
An area having LGP 1 to 74 days is
Extra-long staple hybrid of cotton is
The process of removing the green colouring (known as chlorophyll) from the skin of citrus fruit. This is achieved by introducing measured amounts of et...