Question
In the question below are given some statements
followed by some conclusions. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be in variance with commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the given statements disregarding commonly known facts. Statements: No FG is a RT. Some RT are SW. All SW are QA. Only few QA are LM. Conclusions: I. Some RT are QA. II. Some LM are SW. III. All SW being FG is a possibility.Solution
Some RT are SW (I) + All SW are QA (A) → Some RT are QA (I). Hence conclusion I follows. All SW are QA (A) + Some QA are LM (I) → No conclusion. Hence conclusion II does not follow. No FG is a RT (E) + Some RT are SW (I) → Some SW are not FG (O*) → Probable conclusion → Some SW RT be FG (I). Hence conclusion III does not follow.
The death benefit under the Pradhan Mantri Jeevan Jyoti Bima Yojana (PMJJBY) is:
Who authored the book "March of Glory" based on India’s 1975 Hockey World Cup victory?
What was the trade deficit for India in December 2024?
Ministry of Agriculture & Farmers Welfare (MoA&FW) signs MOU with which firm for developing a National Interactive Digital Platform to strengthen extens...
On which date Janjatiya Gaurav Divas is observed?
Union Ayush Minister, Sarbananda Sonowal has laid the foundation stone of the Heartfulness International Yoga Academy in which state?
- Which schemes have been merged under the restructured Skill India Programme (SIP)?
Who released the book "The Emergency Diaries – Years that Forged a Leader" in 2025?
Which private sector bank announced the launch of a new range of co-branded credit cards with Retailio?
In which Indian city is the Lingaraj Temple located?