Question
In the question below are given some statements
followed by some conclusions. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be in variance with commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the given statements disregarding commonly known facts. Statements: No FG is a RT. Some RT are SW. All SW are QA. Only few QA are LM. Conclusions: I. Some RT are QA. II. Some LM are SW. III. All SW being FG is a possibility.Solution
Some RT are SW (I) + All SW are QA (A) β Some RT are QA (I). Hence conclusion I follows. All SW are QA (A) + Some QA are LM (I) β No conclusion. Hence conclusion II does not follow. No FG is a RT (E) + Some RT are SW (I) β Some SW are not FG (O*) β Probable conclusion β Some SW RT be FG (I). Hence conclusion III does not follow.
Match Column I and Column II and choose the correct match from the given choices
Column (1)
In the following questions, a sentence is given with three blanks. A table is followed by the question with three columns. You are required to complete...
Directions: You are required to match statements from columns 1 and 2 and find which of the following pairs of statement make sense meaningfully and gr...
Match Column I and Column II and choose the correct match from the given choice
Match Column I and Column II and choose the correct match from the given choices
Directions: Choose the combination that completes the sentences.Β If none of the options given forms a correct sentence after combination, mark (e), i...
Relevant for Exams: