Question
In the question below are given some statements
followed by some conclusions. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be in variance with commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the given statements disregarding commonly known facts. Statements: No FG is a RT. Some RT are SW. All SW are QA. Only few QA are LM. Conclusions: I. Some RT are QA. II. Some LM are SW. III. All SW being FG is a possibility.Solution
Some RT are SW (I) + All SW are QA (A) → Some RT are QA (I). Hence conclusion I follows. All SW are QA (A) + Some QA are LM (I) → No conclusion. Hence conclusion II does not follow. No FG is a RT (E) + Some RT are SW (I) → Some SW are not FG (O*) → Probable conclusion → Some SW RT be FG (I). Hence conclusion III does not follow.
State Bank of India has issued bonds worth ________ of senior 5-year notes at a coupon of 4.875%.
What global climate monitoring facility faces shutdown due to budget cuts in the USA?Â
How many children died daily in road crashes in India in 2022, as per the UNICEF and WHO report?
Which Indian state became the first to adopt Android-based e-voting for urban elections?Â
What distinguishes SEBI’s revised Enhanced Surveillance Mechanism (ESM) for small-cap stocks?Â
Which payments bank has collaborated with Park+ to enable a FASTag-based smart parking solution at Varanasi's Lal Bahadur Shastri Airport?Â
What is the name of the AI model firm developing a 120-billion parameter model under IndiaAI Mission?
How many textile parks will be developed under the PM MITRA scheme, and what is the expected investment?
Which temple is also known by the name 'Yamanika Tirtha'?
Who assumed the chairmanship of the Colombo Process for 2024-26?