Question
In the question below are given some statements
followed by some conclusions. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be in variance with commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the given statements disregarding commonly known facts. Statements: No FG is a RT. Some RT are SW. All SW are QA. Only few QA are LM. Conclusions: I. Some RT are QA. II. Some LM are SW. III. All SW being FG is a possibility.Solution
Some RT are SW (I) + All SW are QA (A) → Some RT are QA (I). Hence conclusion I follows. All SW are QA (A) + Some QA are LM (I) → No conclusion. Hence conclusion II does not follow. No FG is a RT (E) + Some RT are SW (I) → Some SW are not FG (O*) → Probable conclusion → Some SW RT be FG (I). Hence conclusion III does not follow.
In which language is ‘Eklingamahatmya’ written ?
Which taxes is not levied by the Central Government?
In a certain code language, 'BRINJAL' is written as 'RBINLJA'. How will 'TRANCES' be written in that code language? Â
Which Harappan city was divided into three sections?
Where has Union Minister Jitendra Singh inaugurated India's first Open Rock Museum on January, 2022?
What is the name of the Earth's outermost solid layer?
Which is the main source of income of the Gram Panchayat?
What is India’s predicted economic growth, as per Union Budget 2022 – 23?
Which hormone controls the growth of the body?
The igneous rocks are formed due to