Question
In the question below are given some statements
followed by some conclusions. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be in variance with commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the given statements disregarding commonly known facts. Statements: No FG is a RT. Some RT are SW. All SW are QA. Only few QA are LM. Conclusions: I. Some RT are QA. II. Some LM are SW. III. All SW being FG is a possibility.Solution
Some RT are SW (I) + All SW are QA (A) → Some RT are QA (I). Hence conclusion I follows. All SW are QA (A) + Some QA are LM (I) → No conclusion. Hence conclusion II does not follow. No FG is a RT (E) + Some RT are SW (I) → Some SW are not FG (O*) → Probable conclusion → Some SW RT be FG (I). Hence conclusion III does not follow.
With reference to the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, upon application of the decree holder the court which passed the decree may, whenever think fit iss...
During a night raid, a burglar enters a residential house with the intention of committing theft. Upon confrontation with the homeowner, he causes griev...
Which of the statements are correct relating to the nature of shares or debentures of a company?
In the context of insurance, which tort principle holds a person liable for damages caused by their failure to exercise reasonable care leading to loss ...
“Environmental pollutant” is defined under which section of the Act?Â
Which of the following categories of persons is NOT entitled to free legal services under the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987?Â
As laid down under the Companies Act the instrument creating a charge shall be preserved for a period of _____________ from the date of satisfaction of...
How many digits are there in the Importer Exporter Code?
Which section of Patents Act, 1970 deals with burden of proof in case of suits concerning infringement?
Under the Contract Act where one party promises to perform an act that they knew, or could have known with reasonable diligence, to be impossible or unl...