Question
In the question below are given some statements
followed by some conclusions. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be in variance with commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the given statements disregarding commonly known facts. Statements: No FG is a RT. Some RT are SW. All SW are QA. Only few QA are LM. Conclusions: I. Some RT are QA. II. Some LM are SW. III. All SW being FG is a possibility.Solution
Some RT are SW (I) + All SW are QA (A) → Some RT are QA (I). Hence conclusion I follows. All SW are QA (A) + Some QA are LM (I) → No conclusion. Hence conclusion II does not follow. No FG is a RT (E) + Some RT are SW (I) → Some SW are not FG (O*) → Probable conclusion → Some SW RT be FG (I). Hence conclusion III does not follow.
Read the following sentence to find out whether there is any grammatical mistake/error or idiomatic error in it. The error, if any, will be in one part ...
According to the captain, his small fishing boat can hauling a huge amount of cargo.
Given below are sentences with an error in each. The error is in one part of the sentence. Below each sentence are given the options containing the par...
Indian stocks surged more than/ 2 % on Monday, the bigger gain in three months/ as investors cheered/ the government’s fiscal package.
As the cases surges, (A)/the State quick updated (B)/their triage and treatment protocol (C)/to guide its response (D)/ to the new variant (E).
...Scarcely had he gone(A)/ than I remembered(B)/ his name.(C)/ No error
Everyone are asking for(A) /passes to the music(B)/ festival at Nehru Park(C)/ no error(D)
The people in the courtroom waited for the judge for announce the justice that would be administered to the guilty man.
A nation what had been once tried to kill him was the first to embrace him.
1) you can't
2) afford to be
3) complacent about
4) your security.
5) No error