Question
Three statements are given, followed by two conclusions
numbered I and II. Assuming the statements to be true, even if they seem to be at a variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements. Statements: All Parrot is Hen. Some Parrot is Swan. No Parrot is Peacock. Conclusions: I. Some Swan is Hen. II. Some Hen is not Peacock.Solution
Some Parrot is Swan (A) β Conversion β Some Swan is Parrot (I) + All Parrot is Hen (A β Some Swan is Hen (I). Hence conclusion I follows. No Parrot is Peacock (E) β Conversion β No Peacock is Parrot (E) + All Parrot is Hen (A) β Some Hen is not Peacock (O*). Hence conclusion II follows.
Who emerged victorious at the 2024 Formula One Belgian Grand Prix?
Financial regulation refers to policy making and financial supervision is continuous monitoring of the performance
Chandragupta Maurya defeated Seleucus in which year?
Which of the following is NOT a characteristic of Nagara-style temple architecture?
According to Government plan how many universities will be nurtured as Institute of Eminence
Which of the following statements is correct?
A. An Individual cannot subscribe (invest in) a Certificate of Deposit
B. Companies can subs...
Where is the International Solar Alliance (ISA) headquartered?
Which of the following statements is correct?
A. Treasury bills provide interest coupons as mentioned at the time of issuance of the bill
...
Which of the following pairs (Organization - Headquarters) is incorrectly matched?
A) (UNICEF - New York City, U.S.)
B) (UNEP - Nairob...
Which Indian state is renowned for producing Tangail sarees?