At least some singers are dancers. Some dancers are not lyricist.
All dancers are performers(A) + All performers are singers(A) ⇒ All dancers are singers(A) ⇒ Some dancers are singers(I) ⇒ conversion ⇒ Some singers are dancers(I). All dancers are performers (A) + All performers are singers(A) ⇒ All dancers are singers(A) + No singer is a lyricist (E) ⇒ Some dancers are not lyricist (O). Hence, option 1 is correct. Some dancers are singers ⇒ conversion ⇒ Some singers are dancers(I). Some dancers are singers(I) + . No singer is a lyricist(E) ⇒ Some dancers are not lyricist (O). Hence, option3 is also correct. By elimination method - By option 2, we get, No + some = no definite conclusion between singer and dancer. Hence it is eliminated. By option 4, some + some = no definite conclusion can be drawn between singer and dancer. Hence it is eliminated. By option 1 and 3, the conclusion can be drawn. Hence answer is both 1 and 3.
In which of the provisions of Evidence Act, electronic record has been made admissible as evidence?
The National Investigation Agency Act applies to____.
A financial creditor either by itself or jointly with other financial creditors, or any other person on behalf of the financial creditor, as may be noti...
An accomplice shall be a competent witness against?
Admissions under the Act, are_______.
Who shall be liable for offence of bribing committed by a commercial organisation on a public servant as per the Prevention of corruption Act
Which of the following best describes the scope of administrative law?
If a new company gets registered with a name which resembles the name of existing company, then who will resolve the dispute?
Which of the following is the regulatory and supervisory body under the IBC?
Appeals filed before Securities Appellate Tribunal to be disposed within ___________ from the date of receipt of appeal.
