Start learning 50% faster. Sign in now
Some mobiles are calculators(I) + All calculators are papers(A) ⇒ Some mobiles are papers(I) ⇒ Probable conclusion ⇒ Some mobiles may not be papers(O). All calculators are papers (A) + No paper is a duster(E) ⇒ No calculator is a duster (E) ⇒ conversion ⇒ Some dusters are not calculators(O). By elimination method - By option 1, No + no = no definite conclusion can be drawn between duster and calculator. Hence it is eliminated. By option 2, No + some = Some calculators are not duster. But we can’t conclude that some dusters are not calculators. Hence it is eliminated. By option 3, few + no = Some mobiles are not papers. So possibility can’t be drawn. Hence it is eliminated. By option 4, the conclusion can be drawn. Hence answer is 4.
The period of limitation is regulated by the ________for disputes required to be referred to arbitration
Wrongful loss is?
Mortgagor shall__________ to accessions to mortgaged property
Where are the headquarters of ICAR located
Who are included in the category of persons referred to under section 8(1)9d), based on a reference made by the Lokpal under section 20(1) of the Lokpal...
In Parag Engineering Works v. Union of India and Ors. the Court held________________
According to Section 6 of the Limitation Act, during period of legal disability, the period of limitation shall:
Which section of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 defines an accomplice?
When a fact is declared to be a conclusive proof of other -
Contingent contracts to do or not to do anything if an uncertain future event does not happen can be enforced__________________