Question
Statements: 99% passengers are hostess.
34% hostess are seater. None of the seater are tickets. Conclusions: I. Some passengers can be seater. II. A few hostess are tickets. In the question below there are three statements followed by two conclusions I and II. You have to take the three given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the three statements disregarding commonly known facts.Solution
99% passengers are hostess (A) + 34% hostess are seater (I) β Probable conclusion β Some passengers can be seater (I). Hence conclusion I follows. 34% hostess are seater (I) + None of the seater are tickets (E) β Some hostess are not tickets (O). Hence conclusion II does not follow.
Rational decision making is relies on _______
What is the significance of involving relevant stakeholders in problem identification?
Rohan wants to buy a laptop. He wants a laptop that has 5 GB RAM, cost less than Rs.30,000 and is light weight. Which of the following step of rational ...
Why is it crucial to clearly define the problem in decision-making?
Which of the following techniques of decision making involves a process for arriving at an evaluation of decisions, in which selected individuals are as...
Which of the following decision making technique involves the use of a ‘yes’ or ‘no’ solution to arrive at a decision?
Which type of a decision would it be when an employee in a company is working out a schedule to ensure that all the sales staff arrive at the company co...
Which of the following decision is concerned with solving problems of structured nature?
A plan that provides long-term, repetitive guidance for recurring activities and decisions within an organization is known as _____
Non-Programmed decisions address the _________ problems.