Question
In the following question below are given statements
followed by some conclusions based on these statements. Assuming the statements to be true, even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements. Statements: All Diamond are Gold. Some Diamond are Silver. Conclusions: I. Some Gold are Silver. II. All Silver are Gold.Solution
Some Diamond are Silver (I) → Conversion → Some Silver are Diamond (I) + All Diamond are Gold (A) → Some Silver are Gold (I) → Conversion → Some Gold are Silver (I). Hence conclusion I follow but conclusion II does not follow.
Communication made in good faith as per S. 93 of IPC should be:
A bailiff acting under an order of the Court does that act without the knowledge that the Court has no jurisdiction to do so____________
Indira Sawhney v. Union of India (1992) laid down which principle?Â
A plea questioning the jurisdiction of the arbitral tribunal
Which of the following offences is not covered by the general defence mentioned under S. 94 that is act compelled by threats of IPC?
Who is a doli capax?
S.R. Bommai v. Union of India (1994) is associated with:Â
Which of the following best describes Parliament's exclusive power under the Constitution, subject to Article 246A?
Section 74 and 75 of the Evidence Act have been combined into one section under which of the following sections in the BharatiyaSakshayaAdhiniyam?
General Explanations are provided under which chapter of IPC?
