Question
given in the statements is true, even if it appears to
be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the given conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements. Statements: Some DS is VB. Some VB is WA. No KL is DS. Conclusions: I. Some VB is not KL. II. Some WA is DS. III. Some DS is not KL.Solution
No KL is DS (E) + Some DS is VB (I) → Some VB is not KL (O*). Hence conclusion I follows. Some DS is VB (I) + Some VB is WA (I) → No conclusion. Hence conclusion II does not follow. No KL is DS (E) → Conversion → Some DS is not KL (O). Hence conclusion III follows.
In which stadium did Indian cricketer Saurav Ganguly take off and waive his t-shirt?
India's average exponential growth rate (population) for the period 2001-2011 was ______% per annum.
The Destructive Insects and Pests Act came into force in the year:
Who was the first social reformer to view modern education as a vehicle for the spread of modern ideas in the country?
In which year was the first Economic Census carried out in India?
In August 2023, the Central government has granted a _______ extension to Cabinet Secretary Rajiv Gauba, making him the longest-serving cabinet secretar...
Which of the following statements is/are true?
(A) COP28 is proposed to be held in New Delhi, India.
(B) The first UN Climate Change ...
Who is the head of a Gram Panchayat in India?
The pensions payable to or in respect of the officers and servants of the Supreme Court are charged upon ________.
Which of the following bank hold 32% in yes bank?