Question
given in the statements is true, even if it appears to
be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the given conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements. Statements: Some DS is VB. Some VB is WA. No KL is DS. Conclusions: I. Some VB is not KL. II. Some WA is DS. III. Some DS is not KL.Solution
No KL is DS (E) + Some DS is VB (I) → Some VB is not KL (O*). Hence conclusion I follows. Some DS is VB (I) + Some VB is WA (I) → No conclusion. Hence conclusion II does not follow. No KL is DS (E) → Conversion → Some DS is not KL (O). Hence conclusion III follows.
Which is the oldest aluminium refinery plant in India?
Which Mauryan emperor had his inscriptions engraved on rocks and pillars during his reign from c. 272/268-231 BCE?
Which of the following is NOT a member of NITI Aayog’s Governing Council?
________ is an unlawful activity where fake websites that look original are presented to the user to fraudulently collect sensitive and personal details...
Around which year did Robert Brown publish a paper highlighting the presence of a nucleus in plant cells?
What is the total sanctioned strength of the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), including both judicial and technical members?
What is the international governing body associated with table tennis?
Rocket works on the principle of which one of the following?
Which city will receive an investment of Rs 5,000 crore from Bajaj Finserv, according to the Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) signed with the Maharasht...
Who has been appointed as the new head of Parliament security?