Question
given in the statements is true, even if it appears to
be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the given conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements. Statements: Some DS is VB. Some VB is WA. No KL is DS. Conclusions: I. Some VB is not KL. II. Some WA is DS. III. Some DS is not KL.Solution
No KL is DS (E) + Some DS is VB (I) → Some VB is not KL (O*). Hence conclusion I follows. Some DS is VB (I) + Some VB is WA (I) → No conclusion. Hence conclusion II does not follow. No KL is DS (E) → Conversion → Some DS is not KL (O). Hence conclusion III follows.
Minimum isolation distance of okra in certified seed (metre)
Lines passing through the least cost points in the isoquant map is called:
Oligosaccharides which encourage the growth of beneficial microorganisms in the gut are called:
First dwarf variety of the world which is considered as a miracle rice?
Total Polar Compounds are formed when:
A method of quantitative chemical analysis used to determine the mass or concentration of a substance by measuring a change in its mass is:
Wolf apple is the common name of
Which of the following is the apex bank for agricultural credit in India?
When one buyer and larger number of sellers, the market condition is known as
Whiptail disease of cauliflower occurred due to the deficiency of which of the following nutrient?
Relevant for Exams:
