Question
given in the statements is true, even if it appears to
be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the given conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements. Statements: Some DS is VB. Some VB is WA. No KL is DS. Conclusions: I. Some VB is not KL. II. Some WA is DS. III. Some DS is not KL.Solution
No KL is DS (E) + Some DS is VB (I) → Some VB is not KL (O*). Hence conclusion I follows. Some DS is VB (I) + Some VB is WA (I) → No conclusion. Hence conclusion II does not follow. No KL is DS (E) → Conversion → Some DS is not KL (O). Hence conclusion III follows.
If you don't believe me, go talk to him and hear it straight from the horse's mouth . It's true.
- Select the most appropriate meaning of the bold idiom in the following sentence.
The politician’s promise to reduce taxes was just a flash in the... When it comes to solving this problem, we need to think outside the box to find a creative solution.
The boss examined my report with a fine tooth comb before submitting it to the senior management.
...In each of the following questions, an idiomatic expression/a proverb has been underlined – followed by four alternatives. Choose the one which best ...
After all the media attention, the event turned out to be a damp squib and very few people attended it.
In the following question, an idiomatic expression or a proverb has been given in bold—followed by four alternatives. Choose the one which best expre...
Choose the correct replacement for the bold phrase.
When the police arrived, the burglars ran over the back wall to escape.
...Select the most appropriate meaning of the given idiom.
full of beans
Idioms are highlighted in the below-given sentences. Choose the option that are similar in meaning to the Idioms.
The new manager's strict po...
Relevant for Exams:
