Start learning 50% faster. Sign in now
All Glasses are Bowls (A) + [Some Cups are Bowls (I) → Conversion] → Some Bowls are Cups (I) → No conclusion. Hence conclusion I does not follow. All Bottles are Glasses (A) + All Glasses are Bowls (A) → All Bottles are Bowls (A). Hence conclusion II follows. All Bottles are Glasses (A) + All Glasses are Bowls (A) → All Bottles are Bowls (A) + [Some Cups are Bowls (I) → Conversion] → Some Bowls are Cups (I) → No conclusion. Hence conclusion III does not follow.
As per the Negotiable Instruments Act the presumption under section 139 is relating to the issue of the cheque for the discharge of any debt is in favo...
Untouchability is ____________________ in India
‘A’ intentionally causes ‘B’s’ death, partly by illegally omitting to give food to ‘B’ and partly by beating ‘B’. What offence, it any...
Where the buyer wrongfully neglects or refuses to accept and pay for the goods
What is the Bailment of goods as security for payment of a debt or performance of a promise called?
The superintendence of the National Investigating Agency shall vest in the ________________
For what period does the Vice President of India hold office?
The accused in the instant case was charged for killing a person by driving over him. A witness saw the vehicle at a high speed, but did not see the ac...
If anybody drives in public in contravention of S.3 and 4 of the Motor vehicles act, he is punishable with:
When did the Motor Vehicles Act came into force?