Question
Statements: No herb is a tree. Some trees are
shrubs. No shrub is petal. Conclusions: I. No petal is a shrub. II. Some shrubs are not herbs. III. No tree is a petal. In each of the questions below are given three statements followed by three conclusions numbered I, II and III. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of given conclusions logically follows from the given statements disregarding commonly known facts.Solution
No shrub is petal(E) ⇒ Conversion ⇒ No petal is a shrub(E). Hence, conclusion I follows. No herb is a tree(E) + Some trees are shrubs(I) ⇒ Some shrubs are not herbs(O*). Hence, conclusion II follows. Some trees are shrubs(I) + No shrub is petal(E) ⇒ Some trees are not petals(O). Hence, conclusion III does not follow
Which Section of Indian Evidence Act is founded on the doctrine laid down in “Pickard v Sears”?
What does "partnership" refer to?
According to the Evidence Act when the language used in a document is plain in itself, but is unmeaning in reference to existing facts____
What does the term "dominant position" refer to in the context of an enterprise operating in the relevant market in India under section 4?
Which international conference is referenced in the preamble of the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 as the basis for its enactment?
Under the Transfer of Property Act, 1882, a "Mortgage by Conditional Sale" is defined under Section:
Which of the following is not true about possession as per S.5 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963?
An oral arbitration agreement:Â
If there is any offending part in a statute, then, only the offending part is declared void and not the entire statute. This is the core theme of
As per section 3 of the Competition Act no enterprise or association of enterprises or person or association of persons shall enter into any agreement ...
Relevant for Exams:
